Johnson v. State, 1 Div. 411.
Decision Date | 13 January 1942 |
Docket Number | 1 Div. 411. |
Citation | Johnson v. State, 5 So.2d 646, 30 Ala.App. 328 (Ala. App. 1942) |
Parties | JOHNSON v. STATE. |
Court | Alabama Court of Appeals |
No attorney marked for appellant.
Thos S. Lawson, Atty. Gen., and Noble J. Russell, Asst. Atty Gen., for the State.
The defendant was convicted in the lower court of an assault with intent to murder, upon one Styron.
A study of the case reveals that the trial was properly and fairly conducted.No error of any kind is apparent in the record.The evidence for the State fully supported the verdict.That for the defendant amply sustained his plea of not guilty.In view of this conflict a jury question was presented.
Under the facts adduced, the defendant was properly denied permission to show that, in a former difficulty between himself and Styron, Styron was at fault.McAnally v. State74 Ala. 9, 17.The trial court correctly followed the settled rule in such cases that the fact of a former difficulty between the principals was admissible, but the details thereof may not be proven.11 Ala. Digest, Homicide, + 157 (3).
...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Bryant v. State
...39 So.2d 657 252 Ala. 153 BRYANT v. STATE. 4 Div. 518.Supreme Court of AlabamaFebruary 24, 1949 ... 24, 30, 59 So. 270; Buffalow v ... State, 219 Ala. 407(1), 122 So. 633; Bowen v ... State, 217 Ala. 574, 578, 117 So. 204; on v ... State, 18 Ala.App. 225, 90 So. 66; Johnson v ... State, 30 Ala.App. 328, 5 So.2d 646; Nettles v ... State, 32 ... ...
-
Moore v. State
...5 So.2d 646 242 Ala. 189 MOORE v. STATE. 8 Div. 161.Supreme Court of AlabamaJanuary 15, 1942 ... Certiorari ... State, 89 Ala. 134, 8 So. 104; ... Slayton v. State, 234 Ala. 1, 173 So. 642 ... The ... writ of certiorari is therefore ... ...