Johnson v. State
Decision Date | 06 August 1976 |
Citation | 335 So.2d 678 |
Parties | In re Oscar Lee JOHNSON v. STATE. Ex parte Oscar Lee Johnson. SC 1932. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals.
William M. Dawson, Jr., Birmingham, for petitioner.
None for the State.
Petition of Oscar Lee Johnson for Certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that Court in Johnson v. State of Ala., 58 Ala.App. ----, 335 So.2d 663.
WRIT DENIED.
To continue reading
Request your trial45 cases
-
Brown v. State
... ... (Emphasis added). Scott v. State, Ala.Cr.App., 353 So.2d 36, cert. denied, Ala., 353 So.2d 40 (1977); Johnson v. State, Ala.Cr.App., 335 So.2d 663, cert. denied, Ala., 335 So.2d 678, cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1026, 97 S.Ct. 649, 50 L.Ed.2d 629 (1976) ... By having pled the defense of entrapment, appellant placed in issue his intent, or lack thereof, to commit the crime. Evidence of ... ...
-
Boggan v. State
... ... See Preyer v. State, 369 So.2d 901 (Ala.Crim.App.1979); Butler v. State, supra; Tice v. State, 386 So.2d 1180 (Ala.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 386 So.2d 1187 (Ala.1980); Dolvin v. State, 391 So.2d 666 (Ala.Crim.App.1979), affirmed, 391 So.2d 677 (Ala.1980); Johnson v. State, 406 So.2d 446 (Ala.Crim.App.1981) ... The appellant argues further that swabbings of blood-stains on his forearms and his blood-stained clothing were improperly obtained as a result of an illegal search ... One of the recognized exceptions for the ... ...
-
Harris v. State
... ... The appellant argues that, as a defendant, she was entitled to be present during every stage, including every pretrial matter, of her trial. In Johnson v. State, 335 So.2d 663, 671-72 (Ala.Cr.App.), cert. denied, 335 So.2d 678 (Ala.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1026, 97 S.Ct. 649, 50 L.Ed.2d 629 (1976), the defendant argued that the trial court erred in overruling his motion to be present at the hearing of his preliminary pretrial motions. This ... ...
-
Watson v. State
... ... Error, if any, in ruling evidence inadmissible in a criminal proceeding is cured by a subsequent admission of the same evidence. Johnson v. State, 378 So.2d 1164 (Ala.Cr.App.), cert. denied, 378 So.2d 1173 (Ala.1979); Simmons v. State, 353 So.2d 11 (Ala.Cr.App.), cert. denied, 353 So.2d 18 (Ala.1977). Sustaining objections to certain questions asked during the cross examination of prosecuting witnesses is not harmful error where ... ...
Request a trial to view additional results