Johnson v. State

CourtAlabama Supreme Court
Writing for the CourtHEAD, J.
CitationJohnson v. State, 13 So. 377 (Ala. 1893)
Decision Date07 June 1893
PartiesJOHNSON v. STATE.

Appeal from city court of Montgomery; Thomas M. Arrington, Judge.

Eugene Johnson was convicted of larceny, and appeals. Reversed.

The appellant was indicted, tried, and convicted under the following indictment: "The grand jury of said county charge that, before the finding of this indictment, Eugene Johnson feloniously took and carried away two bushels of corn, part of an outstanding crop of corn, the property of W T. Merriwether, against the peace and dignity of the state of Alabama." The evidence introduced on the part of the state tended to show that in Montgomery county, within 12 months before the finding of the indictment, the defendant feloniously took and carried away five ears of corn from an outstanding crop of corn; that the land on which the corn was grown was the property of Mrs. Merriwether, who was the wife of the man in whom the property was laid in the indictment. Mr. W. T. Merriwether testified that the land belonged to his wife; that he furnished the labor, and made the crop, and did the farming; but that there was no agreement whatever between him and his wife, who lived together on said...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
2 cases
  • Birmingham Mineral R. Co. v. Harris
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • June 7, 1893
    ... ... Ex parte Matthews, 52 Ala. 51; ... Railroad Co. v. Jones, 68 Ala. 54; Railroad Co. v ... Bayliss, supra; Ex parte State, 87 Ala. 54, 6 South. Rep ... 328. A construction different from the one we now feel ... constrained to place on this statute was given to it in ... ...
  • Johnson v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • January 17, 1894
    ...in this record, the court held that the ownership was improperly laid in him, but should have been laid in Mrs. Merriwether. Johnson v. State, 13 So. 377. adhere to our former ruling, and hold that the ownership was properly laid in Mrs. Merriwether. The statement of Mr. Merriwether, that t......