Johnson v. State (In re State)
Decision Date | 06 October 2006 |
Docket Number | 1041313. |
Citation | 120 So.3d 1119 |
Parties | Ex parte State of Alabama. (In re Shonda Nicole JOHNSON v. STATE of Alabama). |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Troy King, atty. gen.; Kevin C. Newsom, deputy atty. gen.; and Corey L. Maze, asst. atty. gen., for petitioner.
Edward S. Stoffregen III of Newman, Miller, Leo & O'Neal, Birmingham; and Stephen H. Jones, Bessemer, for respondent.
Shonda Nicole Johnson was convicted of capital murder for the killing of Randy McCullar. The murder was made capital because it arose out of or was related to McCullar's role as a witness for the State of Alabama before a grand jury in a bigamy prosecution against Johnson. See § 13A–5–40(a)(14), Ala.Code 1975. The jury, by a vote of 11–1, recommended that Johnson be sentenced to death. The trial court followed the recommendation and sentenced Johnson to death. The Court of Criminal Appeals reversed Johnson's conviction and remanded the case for a new trial on the basis that no limiting instruction had been given on the use by the jury of evidence of Johnson's prior bad acts. Johnson v. State, 120 So.3d 1100 (Ala.Crim.App.2005). We granted the State's petition for a writ of certiorari; we reverse the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals and remand the case.
The Court of Criminal Appeals set forth the trial court's written findings of fact summarizing the crime and Johnson's participation in it:
“ ‘In the early morning hours of November 30, 1997, David O'Mary, a vice president of First National Bank of Jasper, was traveling down Alabama Highway 195 in Walker County. As he drove past the Harmony Missionary Baptist Church, he noticed what appeared to be a man lying next to a parked car in the church parking lot. He noticed that the man was not moving and pulled into the parking lot to investigate. Upon approaching the person, O'Mary noticed that the man had gray color to his complexion. Upon further investigation, he saw that the man had been shot and was, in fact, dead. He notified the authorities of his discovery.
“ ‘Two nights prior to this discovery, the defendant, Shonda [Nicole] Johnson (Richards), and her codefendant/husband,Tim Richards, [1 were having Thanksgiving dinner at the home of Audrey Gray, the sister of Mr. Richards. At the conclusion of the meal and as they were about to leave, the defendant, Shonda Johnson, stated that she and her husband were going “headhunting” and stated that they had a gun in the back of the car. The defendant, Shonda Johnson, and her husband, Timothy Richards, on an earlier visit, discussed the fact that Randy McCullar (later the victim in this matter) was taking the defendant back to court to get custody of their son, Chad. In the conversation, in the presence of Mrs. Gray, there was some mention of the defendant, Shonda Johnson, being raped by Mr. McCullar. When Mrs. Gray realized that they were serious, she told her brother “not to be stupid.”
“ ‘The Saturday after Thanksgiving, 1997, the defendant and Timothy Richards hired a babysitter and went to the Kooler, a restaurant in Jasper, Alabama. They asked for a menu, but were told that the kitchen was closed. They went back to their apartment in Jasper. After a while they both decided to go to the BC Lounge, a Jasper night spot. [Shonda Johnson] had told Richards that Randy McCullar would leave the lounge at 12:00 to 12:30 A.M. and that would be a good time to get rid of him.
“ ‘When they arrived at the BC Lounge they spotted [McCullar's] car. Timothy Richards got out of his car and sliced the tire of McCullar's car. McCullar came out of the lounge. He appeared to be drunk. He got in his car and drove away from the parking lot. At this point the couple lost McCullar. They drove around Jasper until they found him at the Omelet Shoppe in Jasper. When McCullar left the Omelet Shoppe, they followed him traveling north on Highway 195 toward Double Springs in Winston County.
“ ‘At a point the defendant, Shonda Johnson, saw that McCullar had pulled into a church parking lot. They turned around, went to the parking lot of the church, and pulled up to McCullar. Words were exchanged between Johnson and McCullar. Johnson had put shells in the rifle when they were en route following McCullar. As they pulled up to the scene, she “bolted the shells into the chamber.” She then “shoved” the weapon into the hands of Richards. She said, “[D]o it, do it, get it over it.” Richards then point[ed] the gun at the head of McCullar and fire[d] the gun. While backing out of the parking lot, the defendant, Johnson, was laughing and smiling.
“ ‘Johnson and Richards returned to their apartment in Jasper. After a while in the apartment, they both got in the car and drove to Littleton's bridge near Good Springs, Alabama. Richards threw the rifle off the bridge into the river. They later did the same thing with the gun case at Baker's Creek, which is located in the same area of the county.
“ ‘They again returned to their apartment[.] Shonda Johnson wanted to have sex, but Richards could not handle it. Richards stayed up all night. Johnson went to sleep.
“ ”
Johnson, 120 So.3d at 1104–05. Regarding McCullar's role as a witness before the grand jury on the bigamy charge against Johnson, the Court of Criminal Appeals stated:
2
During Johnson's capital-murder trial the trial court admitted evidence of her bigamy conviction and her prior bad acts, which included evidence of adulterous relationships in which she had attempted to solicit her partners to assault or to murder McCullar; evidence indicating that she had attempted to enlist her partners' help in hurting McCullar through sympathy by claiming that McCullar had raped and beaten her; evidence indicating that she had taken or led her partners by McCullar's home on numerous occasions hoping to prompt an altercation; and evidence that she had manipulated Richards in the hope of prompting an altercation with David Prescott, with whom she had previously had an affair. Johnson did not request a limiting instruction relating to this evidence.
In oral argument before the Court of Criminal Appeals, Johnson argued that the trial court had erred in admitting evidence of her bigamy conviction and of her prior bad acts. The State argued on appeal that evidence of Johnson's bigamy conviction and of her prior bad acts was properly admitted because the conviction and the prior bad acts constituted the res gestae of the offense and such evidence was relevant to prove Johnson's motive and intent to commit the offense.
The Court of Criminal Appeals held that evidence of Johnson's bigamy conviction and her prior bad acts was admissible for limited purposes as exceptions to the general rule excluding such evidence. See Rule 404, Ala. R. Evid., and Charles W. Gamble, McElroy's Alabama Evidence § 69.01(1) ( 5th ed.1996). The Court of Criminal Appeals explained that evidence of Johnson's bigamy...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Capote v. State
... ... " Harris v. State , 2 So. 3d 880, 910 (Ala. Crim. App. 2007) (quoting Snyder v. State , 893 So. 2d 488, 548 (Ala. Crim. App. 2003) ). See also Belisle v. State , 11 So. 3d 256, 308 (Ala. Crim. App. 2007) ; Gobble v. State , 104 So. 3d 920, 973 (Ala. Crim. App. 2010) (quoting Johnson v. State , 820 So. 2d 842, 874 (Ala. Crim. App. 2000), quoting in turn Ex parte Boyd , 715 So. 2d 852 (Ala. 1998) ) (" "The absence of an objection in a case involving the death penalty does not preclude review of the issue; however, the defendant's failure to object does weigh[ ] against his ... ...
-
Townes v. State
... ... Kurena , 87 Ill.App.3d 771, 778, 43 Ill.Dec. 277, 410 N.E.2d 277, 284 (1980) ; Pickett v. State , 222 Md.App. 322, 335, 112 A.3d 1078, 108586 (2015). The State may also comment on a defendant's change in appearance when evidence relating to that change has been properly admitted. Johnson v. State , 120 So.3d 1130, 1164 (Ala.Crim.App.2009). The State may not, however, argue that the difference in a defendant's appearance was the result of defense counsel's attempt to "polish" the defendant for the jury. Chamberlain v. State , 46 Ala.App. 642, 643, 247 So.2d 683, 684 ... ...
-
Belcher v. State
... ... In other words, C.J. was rehabilitated. " [J]urors who give responses that would support a challenge for cause may be rehabilitated by subsequent questioning by the prosecutor or the court. Johnson v. State , 820 So. 2d 842, 855 (Ala. Crim. App. 2000). The crucial inquiry is whether the veniremen could follow the court's instructions and obey his oath, notwithstanding his views on capital punishment. McNabb v. State , 887 So. 2d 929, 944 (Ala. Crim. App. 2001), quoting other cases." ... ...
-
Perkins v. Dunn
... ... Perkins's Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody under a Death Sentence, (doc. 1), 1 seeking relief from his state-court conviction for ... the prisoner to an unencumbered opportunity to make his case before a federal judge." Johnson v ... Williams , 568 U.S. 289, 303 (2013). However, "When a federal claim has been presented to a ... ...