Johnson v. Tucker, 7477.
| Decision Date | 25 November 1957 |
| Docket Number | No. 7477.,7477. |
| Citation | 249 F.2d 650 |
| Parties | Nathan JOHNSON, Petitioner, Appellant, v. E. H. TUCKER, Warden, West Virginia Penitentiary, Respondent, Appellee. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit |
Mathias J. DeVito, Baltimore, Md. (Court appointed counsel) for appellant. Nathan Johnson, pro se, on the brief.
W. Bernard Smith, Asst. Atty. Gen. of West Virginia (W. W. Barron, Atty. Gen. of West Virginia, on brief), for appellee.
Before PARKER, Chief Judge, and SOBELOFF and HAYNSWORTH, Circuit Judges.
This is an appeal from an order dismissing a petition for a writ of habeas corpus by a prisoner serving a life sentence imposed by a state court of West Virginia. The questions raised by the petition are the same as those passed upon by the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia in State ex rel. Nathan Johnson v. Skeen, 140 W. Va. 896, 87 S.E.2d 521, certiorari denied 351 U.S. 956, 76 S.Ct. 854, 100 L.Ed. 1478, where the facts are fully stated. We are bound by the interpretation placed by the courts of West Virginia upon the statutes of that state; and in the light of the interpretation placed by that court upon the statutes involved, there is no merit in the contention that appellant has not been thrice convicted of crimes punishable by imprisonment in the penitentiary and therefore punishable under the Habitual Criminal Act of West Virginia, Code, 61-11-18, 61-11-19. The District Judge properly refused to issue a writ of habeas corpus when appellant's contentions had been adequately considered and authoritatively decided by the Supreme Court of the state. Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443, 465, 73 S.Ct. 397, 97 L.Ed. 469. The appeal must be dismissed for lack of the certificate of probable cause required by 28 U.S.C. § 2253; but we may add that, for the reasons here stated, appellant was not and is not entitled to such certificate as his appeal is entirely without merit.
Appeal dismissed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Lawrence v. Peyton
...of the penitentiary authorities." Ibid. We are, of course, bound by the Virginia court's interpretation of its statute, Johnson v. Tucker, 249 F.2d 650 (4 Cir. 1957), though we must independently determine whether the statute as so interpreted and applied to Lawrence's case applies an incor......
-
State ex rel. Mounts v. Boles
...1959, is void and of no force and effect.' * * * 'Since we are bound by that Court's interpretation of this statute, Johnson v. Tucker, Warden, 249 F.2d 650 (4 Cir. 1957), there can be no doubt that the life sentence was void if the petitioner was not 'duly It is apparent from the language ......
-
Turco v. State of Maryland, Civ. A. No. 70-1464-M.
...federal court is bound by its interpretation by the highest state court. Spry v. Boles, 299 F.2d 332 (4th Cir. 1962); Johnson v. Tucker, 249 F.2d 650 (4th Cir. 1957). This Court has found no case in which the Maryland Court of Appeals has made such an interpretation concerning a capital cas......
-
Jordan v. Steiner
...4 Cir., 261 F.2d 452, certiorari denied 359 U.S. 969, 79 S.Ct. 883, 3 L.Ed. 2d 837; Plater v. Warden, 4 Cir., 261 F.2d 445; Johnson v. Tucker, 4 Cir., 249 F.2d 650; Presley v. Peppersack, 4 Cir., 227 F.2d 325; Cumberland v. Warden, 4 Cir., 227 F.2d Leave to file in forma pauperis the petiti......