Johnson v. West Chester & Philadelphia Railroad Co.
Decision Date | 29 January 1872 |
Parties | Johnson <I>versus</I> The West Chester and Philadelphia Railroad Company. |
Court | Pennsylvania Supreme Court |
Before THOMPSON, C. J., AGNEW and SHARSWOOD, JJ. WILLIAMS, J., at Nisi Prius
Error to the Court of Common Pleas of Chester county: No. 176, to January Term 1872.
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED
W. Darlington, for defendants in error.
The opinion of the court was delivered, January 29th 1872, by AGNEW, J.
This case appears to have been carefully tried by the learned and able judge in the court below. Yet, after an attentive examination, we are led to the conclusion, that the rule of concurrent negligence was held a little too closely against the plaintiff, and the province of the jury rather trenched upon. The judge himself states the well-known rule that, "generally what constitutes negligence in a particular case, is a question for the jury:
It is evident, that the meaning which a jury would draw from the charge was, that if the preparation for starting was over, and the train was under way, that, no matter how slow the motion, yet if the running of the train on the track was distinctly visible to a bystander, the plaintiff's time to enter was past, and his attempt to get on the train would be such culpable negligence in law as would bar his recovery. That such a rule may be applicable to some cases, may be true, though we do not now affirm it. But clearly we are not to leave out of view, in all cases, the conduct of the railroad company in producing the result, and the natural and probable effect that conduct has had upon the mind of the passenger in influencing his act. There cannot be an inexorable rule so unbending that no circumstances begotten by the railroad company itself, shall not change it. Even when a train is distinctly under way, there are cases, and this was one, where it must be left to the jury to say whether the danger of going aboard was so apparent that it would be culpable negligence in the passenger to attempt it. Here the West Chester Railroad Company had a running arrangement with the Philadelphia and Baltimore Central Railroad Company, by which their trains met at the Baltimore Junction, and passengers were received from each on through-tickets. The plaintiff's ticket is not questioned. Under such an arrangement, it is the duty of each company to give a reasonable time for the transfer of passengers and their baggage. In this instance, it appears that the West Chester train began to move almost as soon as the Baltimore train stopped. It seems that the conductor of the latter signalled the conductor of the former, that he had no passengers for the West Chester train. But the plaintiff, who had a through-ticket, was not responsible for this mistake. Reasonable time should be allowed to...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Choctaw, O. & G. R. Co. v. Burgess
...Marquette Railway Co. v. Stark, Adm'r, 38 Mich. 714; Swigert v. Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad Co., 75 Mo. 475; Johnson v. West Chester & Philadelphia Railroad Co., 70 Pa. 357; Keating v. N.Y. Central & Hudson River Railroad Co., 49 N.Y. 673; Cent. Railroad & Banking Co. v. Miles, 88 Ala. 2......
-
Charles v. Giant Eagle Markets
...& M., Pass. R. Co. v. Caldwell, 74 Pa. 421 (1873); where the plaintiff committed negligent acts during an emergency, Johnson v. West Chester P.R. Co., 70 Pa. 357 (1872), Corbin v. City of Philadelphia, 195 Pa. 461, 45 A. 1070 (1900) (action taken to save a life), Guca v. Pittsburgh Rys. Co.......
-
Bertram v. Peoples Railway Company
... ... 336; Doud v. Reid, 53 Mo.App. 553; ... Railroad v. St. L. Union Stock Yds. Co., 120 Mo ... 541; Wright ... which said train was being operated, and on the west side of ... said Fourth street, and south of the south ... Cen. R. R. Co. v ... Slatton, 54 Ill. 133; Johnson v. Railroad, 70 ... Pa. 357; Knight v. Railroad, 23 La ... ...
-
Wooten v. Mobile & O.R. Co.
... ... 61 79 Miss. 26 ANN T. WOOTEN v. MOBILE & OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY Supreme Court of MississippiApril 8, 1901 ... opposed to the doctrine as held in Johnson v. West ... Chester, etc., R. R. Co., 70 Pa. 357; Crisse ... ...