Johnston, Nesbitt & Co. v. First Nat. Bank

Decision Date08 February 1906
Citation145 Ala. 378,40 So. 78
PartiesJOHNSTON, NESBITT & CO. v. FIRST NAT. BANK OF GADSDEN.
CourtAlabama Supreme Court

Appeal from City Court of Gadsden; John H. Disque, Judge.

"To be officially reported."

Action by Johnston, Nesbitt & Co. against the First National Bank of Gadsden. From a judgment in favor of defendant, plaintiffs appeal. Dismissed.

W. I. Grubb, for appellants.

A. E. Goodhue, for appellee.

DENSON, J.

In the summons the plaintiffs are described as A. S. Johnston, W. D. Nesbitt, and W. D. Carr, partners as Johnston, Nesbitt & Co., and the complaint follows the summons. This made the suit one by the plaintiffs as individuals, and not one in the name of a partnership; the words "partners as Johnston, Nesbitt & Co." being merely descriptio personæ. Baldridge v. Eason, 99 Ala. 516, 13 So. 74; Compton v. Smith, 120 Ala. 233, 25 So. 300; Bolling v. Speller, 96 Ala. 269, 11 So. 300. Moreover, the suit could not have properly been brought in the name of the partnership. Moore v. Burns, 60 Ala. 269; Lanford v. Patton, 44 Ala. 584.

The certificate of the clerk shows the appeal was taken by a partnership, and not by the plaintiffs, as designated in the summons and complaint. It follows that we cannot entertain the appeal, and it must be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

HARALSON, TYSON, SIMPSON, and ANDERSON, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • State v. Gray
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • January 5, 1927
    ... ... Graves, 25 Neb. 235, ... 41 N.W. 151; Johnson, Nesbitt & Co. v. First Nat ... Bank, 145 Ala. 378, 40 So. 78; ... ...
  • Reynolds v. Scott
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • October 9, 1952
    ...and that the absolute title was vested in the individuals named, Ferrell v. Ross, 200 Ala. 90, 75 So. 466; Johnston, Nesbitt & Co. v. First National Bank, 145 Ala. 378, 40 So. 78; Buckley v. Wilson, 56 Ala. 393; 76 C.J.S., Religious Societies, § 58, page 824, this suit was instituted on the......
  • Ex parte Mathews
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • February 8, 1906
    ... ... 769. But the question ... presented now is one of first impression in this court. This ... power of enforcing ... ...
  • Greenstein v. First Nat. Bank
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • December 17, 1908

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT