Johnston v. Dexel

Citation373 F.Supp.3d 764
Decision Date14 March 2019
Docket NumberCIVIL ACTION NO. H-16-3215
Parties Sherry Lynn JOHNSTON, Plaintiff, v. David DEXEL, et al., Defendants.
CourtU.S. District Court — Southern District of Texas

Susan Cecilia Norman, Attorney at Law, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff.

Julie Ann Countiss, Harris County Attorney's Office, George W. Billy Shepherd, III, Allison Standish Miller, Stephen R. Bailey, Shepherd Prewett Miller PLLC, Jim C. Ezer, Houston, TX, for Defendants.

MEMORANDUM AND OPINION

Lee H. Rosenthal, Chief United States District Judge

Sherry Lynn Johnston's elderly mother, Willie Jo Mills, died in a nursing home. Johnston alleges that Mills received improper and negligent care that led to her death. Johnston asserted a long list of claims against a number of defendants, all of whom she alleged played some role in hastening or causing Mills's death. The defendants moved to dismiss and, based on those motions, the court dismissed each defendant except for David Dexel and Judge Christine Butts. Johnston's only remaining claims are fiduciary-duty breach against Dexel and "gross neglect," TEX. EST. CODE § 1201.003, against Judge Butts.

Dexel and Judge Butts have each moved for summary judgment. Dexel argues that he did not have a fiduciary relationship with Johnston; that Johnston lacks capacity to assert Mills's survival claims under Texas law; and that Johnston has not submitted or identified evidence showing that Dexel breached any fiduciary duty he owed to Johnston or Mills. Judge Butts argues that Johnston lacks capacity to sue under Texas Estates Code § 1201.003 and that Johnston has not submitted or identified evidence supporting an inference that Judge Butts acted with gross neglect in failing to reasonably perform her duties.

Johnston responded that: she has capacity to assert Mills's survival claims against Dexel because the estate administration has been closed; Mills and Dexel were in a fiduciary relationship; and Dexel violated fiduciary duties owed to Mills. As to Judge Butts, Johnston argued that: the Texas Estates Code, § 1201.003, provides a cause of action to any person who is "damaged" by a probate judge's gross neglect, and that the evidence submitted with her second amended complaint supports an inference that Judge Butts did act with gross neglect. Judge Butts and Dexel both replied.

The court ordered briefing on whether the case should be remanded given that all Johnston's federal-law claims have been dismissed. Dexel and Judge Butts opposed remand, but Johnston endorsed it.

Based on a careful review of the second amended complaint, the court's prior rulings, the motions, the responses, the replies, the supplemental briefing, the record evidence, and the applicable law, summary judgment is granted for Judge Butts. The court finds that the statutory and common-law factors favor remanding the remainder of the action to the 253rd Judicial District Court of Liberty County, Texas. The reasons are explained in detail below.

I. Background

In 1999, Mills had a stroke

that paralyzed the right side of her body, leaving her unable to work. Mills had another stroke in 2007, which severely impaired her motor abilities and left her in need of fulltime living assistance. In 2008 and 2009, four doctors separately examined Mills and found that she had moderate to severe dementia, concluding that she could not make reasonable decisions or care for herself. (Docket Entry No. 10-12 at 25–38).

In 2008, Johnston and her sister, Cindy Pierce, sued their brother, Larry Mills, for converting Mills's property and financial assets. A court investigator's June 2008 report found that Johnston was Mills's preferred guardian. A year later, the presiding probate judge appointed Howard Reiner as Mills's attorney ad litem and David Dexel as temporary guardian of the person and estate. Johnston, Pierce, and Larry Mills signed a family settlement agreement. As part of that agreement, the probate judge appointed Dexel as Mills's guardian of the person on a continuing basis.

Dexel hired Ginger Lott and GSL Care Management, LLC to manage Mills's care. Between 2009 and 2012, Johnston frequently visited Mills at Silverado, the nursing home where Mills resided. In 2012, Silverado changed management, and Johnston perceived a decline in the quality of Mills's care. Beginning in 2012 and into 2013, Johnston complained to Dexel about her mother's care. Mills was hospitalized several times with urinary tract infections

. Johnston complained that the infections resulted from poor medical care, but Dexel did not move Mills to a different nursing home. The relationship between Johnston and Dexel deteriorated.

In May 2013, Dexel moved Mills to a section of Silverado that provided high-level care. According to the second amended complaint, this section's residents had behavioral issues and were aggressive toward Mills. That month, Johnston's protests about how Silverado was treating Mills led it to ban Johnston from the premises.

In June 2013, Mills fell out of her wheelchair, breaking several bones in her right leg. Dexel discontinued Mills's physical therapy during her recuperation. Johnston alleges that this made Mills's muscle problems worse. That same month, Dexel allegedly made an "illegal, ex parte , oral motion"—that he filed in writing in the public records of the probate court three days later—to have Clarinda Comstock appointed as Mills's guardian ad litem. (Docket Entry No. 38 at 23 ). Judge Butts, the presiding probate judge, granted the motion, instructing Comstock to investigate Mills's condition and treatment and to report her findings to the court.

Mills continued to deteriorate. By September 2013, she could no longer hold a cup or fork, had lost 30 to 40 pounds, and suffered from recurring urinary tract infections

. Johnston continued to demand that Dexel move Mills to a different nursing home and threatened to ask the court to remove Dexel as Mills's guardian. In response, Dexel filed an application to resign and to have the court appoint a successor guardian.

On September 13, 2013, Dexel notified the interested parties—including Johnston—of a hearing set for September 24, 2013. On September 16, 2013, Comstock filed a report about Mills's condition and treatment, finding that "Ms. Mills has had good care and has enjoyed living at Silverado Kingwood since moving there in 2009, and she has become close to many of the staff members and other residents." (Docket Entry No. 10-12 at 1). Comstock concluded that moving Mills "would be very difficult at the current stage of life of this very fragile woman." (Id. ). But at that time, Silverado had "made the decision that Ms. Mills may not remain in their facility due to the on-going disruptions caused by Ms. Johnston's behavior when visiting Ms. Mills and by postings made online." (Id. at 2). Because of Mills's eviction and Dexel's resignation, Comstock recommended that the court "immediately" appoint "a successor third-party guardian" to "locate an appropriate residential facility for Ms. Mills to ensure her safety and well being," considering "as much as possible her medical, social[,] and emotional needs." (Id. at 2, 24).

Johnston alleges that on September 17—one week before the probate-court hearing date—Dexel, Lott, Comstock, and Judge Butts had an "illegal, ex parte meeting," during which Judge Butts accepted Dexel's resignation and appointed Lott as Mills's successor guardian. (Docket Entry No. 38 at 31 ).

In October 2013, Lott moved Mills from Silverado to the Hampton Nursing Home. In December 2013, Pierce filed an emergency application for a temporary restraining order, alleging that Lott was neglecting Mills's care and that she needed to be immediately removed from the guardian position. (Docket Entry Nos. 10-13–10-14). Less than two weeks later, Judge Butts held a hearing at which Johnston and Pierce testified as to Mills's care, and the parties presented argument. (Docket Entry No. 10-15). The court found no basis to immediately remove Lott, but directed the parties to submit a docket-control order to try the issue. (Id. at 126, 138, 151–53). During the hearing, Johnston, Pierce, and Lott reached an agreement that Johnston and Pierce would receive regular updates on Mills's care and that Johnston's visitation rights would be reinstated. (Id. at 140–41).

Johnston alleges that, in March 2014, Mills's doctor advised Lott that Mills needed to see a cardiologist and an endocrinologist, but Lott failed to set up the appointments. The following month, April 2014, Johnston sent Lott a text message stating that Mills "was delirious and unresponsive with pus in her catheter" and needed to go to the emergency room immediately. (Docket Entry No. 38 at 36–37 ). Lott did not respond to Johnston's text. Johnston called 911 and paramedics arrived in an ambulance. Lott allegedly told the Hampton's personnel to send the paramedics away and called a separate ambulance. Although Lott was the only person with legal authority to sign Mills into the hospital, Lott allegedly never went to the hospital, leaving Mills to sign herself in.

In late April, Pierce filed a second emergency application for a temporary restraining order against Lott which, similar to the first emergency application, alleged that Lott was neglecting Mills's care. (Docket Entry No. 10-16). Sherrie Fox, Judge Butt's guardianship coordinator, informed Johnston's and Pierce's counsel that the "court will not be scheduling a hearing on the [second emergency application]" because the "court does not see an emergency and the case will be tried within two weeks." (Docket Entry No. 38-15).

On September 27, 2014, while the guardianship dispute remained ongoing, Mills died. Johnston alleges that she died of starvation after Lott ordered the nursing home staff to withhold food and give Mills nothing but prunes, water, and thickened water.

Johnston sued in the 253rd Judicial District Court of Liberty County, Texas, in September 2016. The defendants removed to ...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Amawi v. Pflugerville Indep. Sch. Dist., 1:18-CV-1091-RP
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Texas
    • April 25, 2019
  • Konecki v. C.R. Bard, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Texas
    • September 22, 2021
    ... ... Certain Interested Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, ... England v. Layne, 26 F.3d 39, 42 n.1 (6th Cir. 1994); ... Johnston v. Dexel, 373 F.Supp.3d 764, 789 n.6 (S.D ... Tex. 2019) ... Federal ... Rule of Civil Procedure 17 prescribes the ... ...
  • Garcia v. City of Mcallen
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Texas
    • August 24, 2020
    ...are not complex or novel. 34. See Dkt. No. 50 at 7. 35. See Amedisys, 298 F.3d at 447. 36. Id. 37. See Johnston v. Dexel, 373 F. Supp. 3d 764, 776-77 (S.D. Tex. 2019) (Rosenthal, C.J.). 38. Dkt. No. 50 at 7, ¶¶ 2.16.b-2.16.c. 39. See Dkt. No. 42 at 22-23 (discussing the allegations at lengt......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT