Johnston v. Johnston
Decision Date | 15 June 1891 |
Citation | 138 Ill. 385,27 N.E. 930 |
Parties | JOHNSTON v. JOHNSTON. |
Court | Illinois Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Error to circuit court, Mercer county
Pepper & Scott, for plaintiff in error.
J. H. Connell, for defendant in error.
This was a bill in equity in the circuit court of Mercer county, by Michael H. Johnston against his infant daughter, Anna G. Johnston, in which it was alleged that the complainant on the 29th of August, 1882, and on the 28th of August, 1884, purchased the property in question, being certain parts of lots in the village of North Henderson, Mercer county, Ill., and paid for the same, and procured the deeds therefor to be made to his then wife, Anna G. Johnston, thereby having conveyed to her the title to said lots; that it was intended by the complainant that said Anna G. Johnston should hold the title to said lots in trust only, for complainant's benefit, and it was understood by her that she was to hold said lots in trust for complainant, and convey the same to him whenever he should request her so to do; that he took possession of both tracts or lots, built valuable buildings on both of them, made other improvements, and continued to occupy them ever since; that said Anna G. Johnston died on the 5th of November, 1889, intestate, leaving her husband, and Anna G. Johnston, plaintiff in error, her only child, and sole heir at law; that she died without conveying said lots to complainant, although she intended and had promised so to do. The bill then states the plaintiff in error is a minor, asks for a guardian ad litem, and prays for relief, that a deed may be executed to him for the premises. Summons was duly issued and served. The court appointed a guardian ad litem, who filed a pro forma answer, requiring full proof to be made of the allegations of the bill. The court referred the cause to the master in chancery to take and report the testimony, and the master reported the testimony taken by him, as follows: Michael H. Johnston testified: On cross-examination he said: W. C. Galloway testified: James Galloway testified: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Spotts v. Spotts
... ... 320 (incompetent ... evidence in equity case excluded on appeal although no ... objection on behalf of infant party); Johnston v ... Johnston (Ill.), 27 N.E. 930 (incompetent evidence ... likewise excluded); Jespersen v. Mech (Ill.), 72 ... N.E. 1114; Spradlin v ... ...
-
David Adler & Sons Clothing Company v. Hellman
...communications properly intrusted to him in his professional capacity. (Wertz v. Merritt, 39 N.W. 103 [Ia.]; Johnston v. Johnston, 27 N.E. 930 [Ill.]; Muir v. Miller, 47 N.W. 1011 [Ia.]; Bradford v. Cinton, 26 N.W. 401 [Mich.]; Brock v. Brock, 9 A. [Pa.] 486; Skinner v. Skinner, 38 Neb. 756......
-
Dorman v. Dorman
...court in numerous cases. Taylor v. Taylor, 4 Gilman, 303;Adlard v. Adlard, 65 Ill. 212;Wormley v. Wormley, 98 Ill. 544;Johnston v. Johnston, 138 Ill. 385, 27 N. E. 930;Smith v. Smith, 144 Ill. 299, 33 N. E. 35;Goelz v. Goelz, 157 Ill. 33, 41 N. E. 756;Van Buskirk v. Van Buskirk, 148 Ill. 9,......
-
Lewis v. McGrath
...court in numerous cases. Taylor v. Taylor, 4 Gilman, 303;Adlard v. Adlard, 65 Ill. 212;Wormley v. Wormley, 98 Ill. 544;Johnston v. Johnston, 138 Ill. 385, 27 N. E. 930;Smith v. Smith, 144 Ill. 299, 33 N. E. 35;Goelz v. Goelz, 157 Ill. 33, 41 N. E. 756:Van Buskirk v. Van Buskirk, 148 Ill. 9,......