Johnston v. Reilly
Decision Date | 13 May 1904 |
Citation | 66 N.J.E. 451,57 A. 1049 |
Parties | JOHNSTON v. REILLY et al. |
Court | New Jersey Supreme Court |
(Syllabus by the Court.)
Appeal from Supreme Court.
Bill by Aaron E. Johnston, executor of Mary E. Throckmorton, against Patrick J. Reilly and others. Decree for plaintiff, and defendants appeal. Affirmed.
Chas. J. Roe, for appellants.
Aaron E. Johnston, in pro. per.
According to the allegations in this bill, Van Note intended to convey to Mary E. Throckmorton his legal title to the property subject to the defendant's incumbrances; and the defendants, by representing to Van Note that they were acting in the interest and for the benefit of Mrs. Throckmorton, so as to secure for her the surplus arising from the sale of the property on the foreclosure of their incumbrances, induced Van Note to convey his title to them. These incumbrances would establish against the defendants, in favor of Mrs. Throckmorton, a constructive trust, arising ex maleficio, coextensive with the representations so made (2 Pom. Eq. Jur. § 1055), without regard to the question whether there was any enforceable arrangement between her and Van Note.
The order overruling the demurrer to the bill is affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Suhre v. Busch
...matter (corpus) of such a trust. 1 Perry on Trusts & Trustees (7 Ed.), sec. 215, p. 378; Janssen v. Christian, 57 S.W.2d 692; Johnson v. Reilly, 57 A. 1049; Fishbeck Gross, 112 Ill. 208. (3) The evidence failed completely to prove the constructive trust ex maleficio, on which appellant seek......
- Gaskill v. Polhemus