Johnston v. State
Decision Date | 14 October 1986 |
Docket Number | 4 Div. 676 |
Citation | 497 So.2d 844 |
Parties | James W. JOHNSTON v. STATE. |
Court | Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals |
Allen Edward Cook and Benton Persons, Andalusia, for appellant.
Charles A. Graddick, Atty. Gen., and Martha Gail Ingram, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
James W. Johnston was charged with and convicted of capital murder of Miss Mildred Hart, a 67-year-old resident of Andalusia, Alabama. His case was appealed to this court, which reversed and remanded. Johnston v. State, 455 So.2d 152 (Ala.Cr.App.), cert. denied, 455 So.2d 152 (1984). He was again tried, but this time convicted of murder rather than capital murder. He was sentenced to life imprisonment in the penitentiary; from this second conviction and sentence he prosecutes this appeal.
One of the issues in the case is sufficiency of the evidence. The statement of facts presented by the attorney general provides a summary of the state's evidence, and we set it out here:
Appellant first contends that his utterance while in custody on May 17, 1982 was inadmissible because it was the fruit of an illegal arrest. This was the statement made in the presence of three officers at the hospital and quoted above:
This contention was made at the first trial and on the first appeal of this case, and the determination and ruling were made at that time that this utterance was admissible as a voluntary statement. Consequently, this issue is res judicata as to us now.
Appellant next contends that the court erred in admitting his three pre-arrest statements because they were denials instead of admissions. The appellant made comments to Officer Treadaway before he was arrested as follows:
The admissibility of these statements was treated at length in the first appeal of this case. The court there ruled that all three statements were...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Bankhead v. State
...a juror he can find a true verdict on the evidence alone." Kinder v. State, 515 So.2d 55, 60-61 (Ala.Cr.App.1986); Johnston v. State, 497 So.2d 844, 849 (Ala.Cr.App.1986). Moreover, as stated in Irvin v. Dowd, 366 U.S. 717, 722-23, 81 S.Ct. 1639, 1642, 6 L.Ed.2d 751 "It is not required, how......
-
Whitehead v. State
...So.2d 531 (Ala.1991), quoting Irvin v. Dowd, 366 U.S. 717, 723, 81 S.Ct. 1639, 1643, 6 L.Ed.2d 751 (1961). See also Johnston v. State, 497 So.2d 844, 849 (Ala.Cr.App.1986) (a juror "is not disqualified if he states that he can find a true verdict on the evidence alone"); and Stringfellow v.......
-
Donahoo v. State, 7 Div. 977
...a juror he can find a true verdict on the evidence alone." Kinder v. State, 515 So.2d 55, 60-61 (Ala.Cr.App.1986); Johnston v. State, 497 So.2d 844, 849 (Ala.Cr.App.1986). Moreover, as stated in Irvin v. Dowd, 366 U.S. 717, 722-23, 81 S.Ct. 1639, 1642, 6 L.Ed.2d 751 "It is not required, how......
-
Smith v. State
...evidence presented in court." Irvin v. Dowd, 366 U.S. 717, 723, 81 S.Ct. 1639, 1643, 6 L.Ed.2d 751 (1961). See also Johnston v. State, 497 So.2d 844, 849 (Ala.Cr.App.1986) (a juror "is not disqualified if he states that he can find a true verdict on the evidence alone"); Stringfellow v. Sta......