Johnston v. State

Decision Date30 September 1841
CitationJohnston v. State, 7 Mo. 183 (Mo. 1841)
PartiesJOHNSTON v. THE STATE.
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF BENTON COUNTY.

WINSTON, for Appellant. 1st. As the indictment against the defendant was for a felony, it was error to give a judgment against him for a misdemeanor. 2nd. There was error in permitting evidence of two assaults to be given to the jury, when the defendant was only charged with one.

NAPTON, J.

The appellant was indicted by the grand jury of Benton county, for a felonious assault. The indictment was framed under the 35th section of the 2nd article of the act concerning Crimes and Punishments. The jury found the defendant guilty, and assessed as his punishment a fine of fifty dollars, and twenty-seven days imprisonment in the county jail. It appears from the bill of exceptions, that the appellant had an altercation with one Hughes, and struck the said Hughes with a stick of timber, and a fight ensued between the said appellant and Hughes, during which several blows on the head were inflicted by Johnston with the stick aforesaid. After the parties were separated, it was further proved by the prosecutor, that Johnston immediately seized an axe, and attempted to strike Hughes, but was prevented. This last testimony was objected to by defendant. Motions for a new trial and in arrest of judgment were made, but overruled by the court. The error assigned in this court is, that the indictment was for a felony, and the judgment against appellant was for a misdemeanor. This is a mistake originating, I...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
36 cases
  • The State v. Webb
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • February 9, 1916
    ... ... was had for a battery accruing from the use of mere fists. At ... least, a fairly exhaustive search for such a one has not been ... rewarded. These are the cases and the instrumentalities: ... State v. Leonard, 22 Mo. 449 (a large stone, said to ... have been a "deadly weapon"); Johnston v ... State, 7 Mo. 183 (a stick of timber); Jennings v ... State, 9 Mo. 862 (a large iron auger); State v ... Freeman, 21 Mo. 481 (an iron shovel); State v ... Bohannon, 21 Mo. 490 (a rock, and that maiming occurred ... in that a thumb was bitten off); State v. Thompson, ... 30 ... ...
  • State v. Webb
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • February 9, 1916
    ... ... At least, a fairly exhaustive search for such a one has not been rewarded. These are the cases and the instrumentalities: State v. Leonard, 22 Mo. 449 (a large stone, said to have been a "deadly weapon"); Johnston v. State, 7 Mo. 183 (a stick of timber); Jennings v. State, 9 Mo. 862 (a large iron auger); State v. Freeman, 21 Mo. 481 (an iron shovel); State v. Bohannon, 21 Mo. 490 (a rock, and that maiming occurred in that a thumb was bitten off); State v. Thompson, 30 Mo. 470 (a hoe handle); State v. Moore, ... ...
  • State ex rel. Butler v. Foster
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • March 30, 1905
    ...include punishment by jail sentence, or by fine, or both, does not rob it of its felonious character. State v. Ingrahm, 7 Mo. 293; State v. Johnson, 7 Mo. 183; State Nathan, 8 Mo. 631; State v. Feaslor, 25 Mo. 324; State v. McCorron, 51 Mo. 27; State v. Green, 66 Mo. 631; State v. Weldon, 7......
  • State v. Johnson
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • October 12, 1909
    ...will not reduce the crime to the grade of a misdemeanor. State v. Reeves, 97 Mo. 668, 10 S. W. 841, 10 Am. St. Rep. 349; Johnston v. State, 7 Mo. 183; Ingram v. State, 7 Mo. 293; State v. Green, 66 Mo. 631; State v. Clayton, 100 Mo. 516, 13 S. W. 819, 18 Am. St. Rep. 565; State v. Gilmore, ......
  • Get Started for Free