Jones Leasing, Inc. v. Gene Phillips & Associates
| Decision Date | 26 April 1984 |
| Docket Number | No. 0214,0214 |
| Citation | 282 S.C. 327,318 S.E.2d 31 |
| Court | South Carolina Court of Appeals |
| Parties | , 39 UCC Rep.Serv. 422 JONES LEASING, INC., Respondent, v. GENE PHILLIPS & ASSOCIATES, Appellant. . Heard |
James E. Chaffin, Jr., Columbia, for appellant.
Robert E. Staton of Quinn & Smith, Columbia, for respondent.
Respondent Jones Leasing, Inc., initiated an action against appellant "Gene Phillips and Associates" for breach of two automobile leases. The trial judge sustained Jones' motion for summary judgment as to liability and awarded partial damages. We affirm.
A motion for summary judgment is properly granted when there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Ray v. South Carolina National Bank, 314 S.E.2d 359 (S.C.App.1984).
The undisputed facts here may be summarized as follows:
Phillip entered into contracts leasing two vehicles from Jones, one a 1978 Chevrolet van and the other a 1979 Corvette.
The leases on the Chevrolet van and Corvette provided for monthly rental payments of $245 and $278, respectively, plus South Carolina sales tax. The lease on the van was for 24 months, January 1979--January 1981. The lease on the Corvette was for 28 months, July 1979--November 1981. In addition, both leases contained the following paragraph, with the residual value of the van filled in as $3,500 and that of the Corvette filled in as $9,200:
11. Lessee agrees that at the expiration of this lease, Lessee will surrender the leased vehicle to the Lessor and the Lessor agrees to sell the same at wholesale within thirty (30) days of the expiration of this lease. If the property shall bring more than $________, then the excess above that amount shall be returned to the Lessee. If the vehicle shall bring less than $________, then the Lessee shall pay the Lessor the difference in the sales price and $________. Lessee shall also pay lessor any rent due Lessor or any additional sum or sums expended by Lessor for which the Lessee is chargeable under this lease. Lessee shall have the right to purchase the vehicle leased hereunder from the Lessor at the expiration of the term of this lease for $________, plus all applicable taxes incurred in connection with transfer of the title of the vehicle. If Lessee desires to exercise his option to purchase as aforesaid, written notice must be given to the Lessor on or before the last day of the term of this lease.
According to the pleadings and Phillips' own deposition, he returned both vehicles to Jones in early November 1980. He conceded that as of October 1980, he was in arrears in the amount of $2,552.81 on both leases and has made no payments since. Pursuant to paragraph 11, Jones then sold the van for $2,200 (leaving a deficiency of $1,945) and sold the Corvette for $8,600 (leaving a deficiency of $3,936).
Jones sued Phillips for (1) the balance of unpaid monthly payments (2) the alleged deficiency resulting from the sale of the vehicles.
Phillips argues the leases are unconscionable and therefore unenforceable within the meaning of section 36-2-302 of the 1976 Code of Laws of South Carolina:
Unconscionable contract or clause.
(1) If the court as a matter of law finds the contract or any clause of the contract to have been unconscionable at the time it was made the court may refuse to enforce the contract, or it may enforce the remainder of the contract without the unconscionable clause, or it may so limit the application of any unconscionable clause as to avoid any unconscionable result.
(2) When it is claimed or appears to the court that the contract or any clause thereof may be unconscionable the parties shall be afforded a reasonable opportunity to present evidence as to its commercial setting, purpose and effect to aid the court in making the determination. 1
Specifically, Phillips challenges the conscionability of the following identical provisions in each lease:
15. If Lessee fails to pay when due any rent or other amount required herein to be paid to Lessor by Lessee, or if Lessee fails to perform any other provision hereof, or if any proceeding in bankruptcy, an arrangement, reorganization, receivership, or similar type proceeding shall be commenced by or against Lessee or its property, or if Lessee makes any assignment for the benefit of creditors, or if the vehicle leased hereunder or all or any part of Lessee's property is attached, seized, subject to a writ or distress warrant, or is levied upon, or if Lessee shall fail to maintain insurance on the vehicle as provided for above, or if Lessor shall for reasonable cause deem itself insecure, then Lessor shall have the right, but shall not be obligated, to exercise any one or more of the following remedies:
(a) To sue for and recover all rents and other amounts then due or thereafter accruing under this lease;
(b) To take possession of the vehicle, wherever it may be located, without demand or notice, without any court order or process of law, and without incurring any liability to Lessee for any damages occasioned by such taking of possession;
(c) To sell the vehicle at public or private sale upon such terms as it deems advisable, and in the event of such sale, Lessor shall, in addition to all other rights and remedies hereunder be entitled to retain as liquidated damages and not as penalties the proceeds of any such sale;
(d) To terminate this lease; and
(e) To pursue any other remedy now or hereafter existing at law or in equity.
Lessee shall pay Lessor all costs or expenses, including reasonable attorneys' fees and fees of collection agencies incurred by Lessor in exercising any of its rights or remedies hereunder. Notwithstanding any such action, Lessor may take, including taking possession of the vehicle, Lessee shall remain liable for the full performance of its obligations hereunder.
Phillips argues these provisions subject the lessee to such harsh and punitive measures for even the most trivial breach (without providing the lessee any remedy for breach by the lessor) that this Court should not aid in the enforcement of the leases.
The trial judge found as a matter of...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Hooters of America, Inc. v. Phillips
...Int'l, Inc. v. Burlington Industries, Inc., 935 F.2d 267, 1991 WL 97487 (4th Cir.1991) (quoting Jones Leasing, Inc. v. Gene Phillips & Assoc., 282 S.C. 327, 318 S.E.2d 31, 33 (App.1984)). The Fourth Circuit has also isolated six factors relevant to an unconscionability inquiry: (1) the natu......
-
South Carolina Elec. & Gas v. Westinghouse Elec.
...between two sophisticated parties such as the corporate entities represented herein. Jones Leasing, Inc. v. Gene Phillips and Associates, 282 S.C. 327, 318 S.E.2d 31, 33 (Ct.App. 1984). However, the fact that a contract has been negotiated in a commercial setting is not dispositive on the i......
-
Barras ex rel. v. Branch Banking & Trust Co. (In re Checking Account Overdraft Litig. MDL No. 2036)
...with, e.g.,Hardee v. Hardee, 355 S.C. 382, 585 S.E.2d 501, 505 (2003) (pre-nuptial agreement), Jones Leasing, Inc. v. Gene Phillips & Assocs., 282 S.C. 327, 318 S.E.2d 31, 33—34 (S.C.Ct.App.1984) (automobile lease agreement), andS.C.Code Ann. § 36–2–302 (codifying applicability of unconscio......
-
Lackey v. Green Tree Financial Corp.
...Pontiac-Cadillac-Buick Inc., 322 S.C. 399, 402, 472 S.E.2d 242, 245 (1996) (emphasis added) (citing Jones Leasing v. Gene Phillips and Assocs., 282 S.C. 327, 318 S.E.2d 31 (Ct.App.1984)). The issues raised in this case have not been thoroughly addressed in this state before. The federal dis......