Jones-Lowe Co. v. Southern Land Co.
Decision Date | 06 March 2009 |
Docket Number | 1071575. |
Citation | 18 So.3d 362 |
Parties | JONES-LOWE COMPANY et al. v. SOUTHERN LAND AND EXPLORATION COMPANY, INC. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
and Jack Livingston, Scottsboro, for appellants.
E. Allen Dodd, Jr., of Scruggs, Dodd & Dodd, Attorneys, P.A., Fort Payne, for appellee.
Jones-Lowe Company, a general partnership composed of Raymond B. Jones, Peter L. Lowe, and others; G.W. Jones & Sons, a former partnership composed of Raymond B. Jones and Carl T. Jones, deceased; Peter L. Lowe; and Raymond B. Jones (all collectively referred to hereinafter as "Jones-Lowe")1 appeal from a summary judgment for Southern Land and Exploration Company, Inc. ("SOLEXCO"), in SOLEXCO's action against Jones-Lowe to quiet title to mineral rights in real estate located in DeKalb County ("the property"). We reverse and remand.
This property dispute involves several complex chains of title that allegedly diverged from a common source late in the 19th century. Most recently, in 1958, the interest of A.F. Kralik Point Realty Company was purchased by the State Land Commissioner ("the Commissioner") at a tax sale resulting from unpaid ad valorem taxes. On October 26, 1966, G.W. Jones & Sons purchased the State's interest in the property, which was defined in the deed from the Commissioner as "mineral rights only." Through a series of transactions, Jones-Lowe Company eventually acquired that interest. Jones-Lowe Company or its predecessors have paid taxes on the mineral interests in the property since 1966.
Ten years later, on June 23, 1976, the Commissioner executed a deed purporting to sell "the minerals and mineral interests" in the property to SOLEXCO. SOLEXCO has also paid taxes on the mineral interests in the property since 1976.
On July 3, 2007, SOLEXCO commenced this action to quiet title to the mineral rights. Jones-Lowe answered the complaint and filed a counterclaim, seeking a judgment quieting title in Jones-Lowe Company. On January 17, 2008, SOLEXCO filed a single document, namely, a motion for a summary judgment. The "Statement of Material Undisputed Facts" section of that motion contained, in pertinent part, the following averments, hereinafter referred to collectively as "the motion averments":
(Emphasis in original.) SOLEXCO did not support its motion with copies of any of the above-referenced instruments or with any other evidence.
Jones-Lowe filed a cross-motion for a summary judgment. SOLEXCO filed an opposition to the cross-motion, supported only by the affidavit of Woodrow Hobson, Jr., president of SOLEXCO. On July 8, 2008, the circuit court granted SOLEXCO's summary-judgment motion and denied Jones-Lowe's cross-motion. In so doing, the court stated, in pertinent part:
(Emphasis added.)
On appeal,...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
White Sands Group, LLC v. PRS II, LLC
...would entitle it to a judgment as a matter of law `if this evidence was not controverted at trial.'" Jones-Lowe Co. v. Southern Land & Exploration Co., 18 So.3d 362, 367 (Ala.2009) (quoting Denmark v. Mercantile Stores Co., 844 So.2d at 1195) (emphasis omitted). In other words, PRS II had t......
-
Denault v. Fed. Nat'l Mortg. Ass'n & Seterus, Inc.
...this filing to be $1,398/month, based on public property data and similar properties listed for rent." See Jones-Lowe Co. v. Southern Land & Expl. Co., 18 So.3d 362, 368 (Ala. 2009) (" ‘ "[M]otions and arguments of counsel are not evidence." Williams v. Akzo Nobel Chemicals, Inc., 999 S.W.2......
-
Barter v. Burton Garland Revocable Trust
...799 F.2d 254 (6th Cir.1986).' “Denmark v. Mercantile Stores Co., 844 So.2d 1189, 1195 (Ala.2002).”Jones–Lowe Co. v. Southern Land & Exploration Co., 18 So.3d 362, 367 (Ala.2009). We note, however, that “all evidence of record, as well as that evidence formally submitted in support of or in ......
-
Macon County Greyhound Park Inc v. Knowles
...v. Upjohn Co., 780 F.2d 1190 (5th Cir.1986); Calderone v. United States, 799 F.2d 254 (6th Cir.1986).' ” Jones-Lowe Co. v. Southern Land & Exploration Co., 18 So.3d 362, 367 (Ala.2009) Denmark v. Mercantile Stores Co., 844 So.2d 1189, 1195 (Ala.2002)). As discussed in the previous part of t......