Jones v. Campbell, Wyant & Cannon Foundry Co.

Decision Date06 June 1938
Docket NumberNo. 29.,29.
Citation279 N.W. 860,284 Mich. 358
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
PartiesJONES v. CAMPBELL, WYANT & CANNON FOUNDRY CO. et al.

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Appeal from Department of Labor and Industry.

Proceeding under the Workmen's Compensation Act by Charles Jones, employee, opposed by Campbell, Wyant & Cannon Foundry Company, employer, and others.From an award of compensation by the Department of Labor and Industry, the employer and others appeal.

Award vacated.

Argued before the Entire Bench.

L. J. Carey and Geo. J. Cooper, both of Detroit, for appellants.

F. E. Wetmore, of Hart, for appellee.

WIEST, Chief Justice.

In February, 1937, plaintiff was employed in defendant's foundry, breaking up and putting slag in buckets, to be removed by a motor truck, operated by others.While he was running an electric truck, as he claims, by permission of its regular operator, a fellow employee grabbed hold of him and, to support himself, he seized the reverse operating lever, the truck moved backward, bumped him against a wall and he sustained a fracture of the left pelvis.He was in a hospital for several weeks and made a good recovery.

The department of labor and industry awarded him compensation during the period of disability and for hospital expenses.

Defendant prosecutes review, contending that plaintiff was injured by the horseplay of a fellow employee and, therefore, not by an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment.

The evidence negatived any motive on the part of the fellow employee, outside of playfulness.The department entertained and expressed the opinion that, inasmuch as plaintiff was not a participant in the play, the decisions of this court in so-called horseplay instances did not control.

In Tarpper v. Weston-Mott Co., 200 Mich. 275, 166 N.W. 857, L.R.A. 1918E, 507, the victim of a fellow servant's...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
4 cases
  • Crilly v. Ballou
    • United States
    • Michigan Supreme Court
    • July 15, 1958
    ...Court dealing with horseplay: Tarpper v. Weston-Mott Co., 200 Mich. 275, 166 N.W. 857, L.R.A.1918E, 507; Jones v. Campbell, Wyant & Cannon Foundry Co., 284 Mich. 358, 279 N.W. 860; Derhammer v. Detroit News, 229 Mich. 658, 202 N.W. 958; Steffes v. Ford Motor Co., 239 Mich. 501, 214 N.W. The......
  • Freiborg v. Chrysler Corp.
    • United States
    • Michigan Supreme Court
    • October 7, 1957
    ...200 Mich. 275, 166 N.W. 857, L.R.A.1918E, 507; Derhammer v. Detroit News, 229 Mich. 658, 202 N.W. 958; and Jones v. Campbell, Wyant & Cannon Foundry Co., 284 Mich. 358, 279 N.W. 860; or while acting contrary to the orders or directions of his employer as in Lauscher v. Montgomery Ward & Co.......
  • Cohn v. Dowling
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit
    • November 4, 1941
  • Mathews v. Life Ins. Co. of Detroit
    • United States
    • Michigan Supreme Court
    • June 6, 1938

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT