Jones v. Carlson, 73-3672. Summary Calendar.
Decision Date | 31 May 1974 |
Docket Number | No. 73-3672. Summary Calendar.,73-3672. Summary Calendar. |
Citation | 495 F.2d 209 |
Parties | Norwood E. JONES and William Scott Winans, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Norman A. CARLSON, Director U. S. Bureau of Prisons, et al., Defendants-Appellees. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit |
Norwood E. Jones, William Scott Winans, pro se.
John W. Stokes, Jr., U. S. Atty., Anthony M. Arnold, Asst. U. S. Atty., Atlanta, Ga., for defendants-appellees.
Before COLEMAN, DYER and RONEY, Circuit Judges.
Jones, an inmate of the United States Penitentiary at Atlanta, Georgia, and Winans, an inmate of the United States Penitentiary at Terre Haute, Indiana, appeal the district court's dismissal of their action for injunction and other relief arising out of the alleged interference with their correspondence concerning pending litigation.
We deem it unnecessary to reach the merits of the ruling appealed since it appears that the appellants have not sought relief through the proper administrative channels before presenting their grievances for judicial review. As the Court stated in Paden v. United States, 5 Cir. 1970, 430 F.2d 882, 883:
See also Waddell v. Alldredge, 3 Cir. 1973, 480 F.2d 1078; Ledesma v. United States, 5 Cir. 1971, 445 F.2d 1323; Williams v. United States, 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 873.
The judgment of the district court is vacated, and the cause remanded with directions that the action be dismissed in order that the appellants may exhaust their administrative remedies in accordance with Bureau of Prisons policy statement 2001.6 (February 14, 1974).1
Vacated and remanded.
* Rule 18, 5 Cir.; Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New York et al., 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I.
1 See Thompson v....
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Serna, In re, Cr. 30154
...parole consideration); United States ex rel. Sanders v. Arnold (3rd Cir. 1976) 535 F.2d 848, 851 (parole revocation); Jones v. Carlson (5th Cir. 1974) 495 F.2d 209, 210 (litigation Reversed. ASHBY, J., concurs. STEPHENS, Associate Justice. I dissent. The admirable brevity of the statement o......
-
U.S. ex rel. Ricketts v. Lightcap, 76-1841
...procedures, see Jones v. North Carolina Prisoners' Labor Union, 433 U.S. 119, 125, 97 S.Ct. 2532, 53 L.Ed.2d 629 (1977); Jones v. Carlson, 495 F.2d 209 (5th Cir. 1974). We do believe that the district courts have available the means to develop flexible procedures which can retain many of th......
-
Bijeol v. Benson, TH 75-24-C.
...Bureau of Prisons' policy before seeking judicial relief. Hardwick v. Ault, 517 F.2d 295 (5th Cir. 1975). In the case of Jones v. Carlson, 495 F.2d 209 (5th Cir. 1974), the Court recognized that before federal prisoners may seek injunctive and other relief arising out of alleged interferenc......
-
Parks v. " MR. FORD"
...... those aspects of plaintiffs' motions for "partial summary judgment" (pursuant to Rule 56(c) of the Federal Rules of ...390, 393 (N.D.Ill.1972), and Klim v. Jones, 315 F.Supp. 109, 117 (N.D.Cal.1970), in which those two ......