Jones v. City of Key West, Fla.
Decision Date | 25 February 1988 |
Docket Number | No. 85-499-CIV-MARCUS.,85-499-CIV-MARCUS. |
Citation | 679 F. Supp. 1547 |
Parties | Douglas M. JONES, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF KEY WEST, FLORIDA and Richard Heyman, Defendants. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Southern District of Florida |
David P. Karcher, Underwood, Gillis, Karcher & Valle, P.A., Miami, Fla., for plaintiff.
Michael T. Burke, Fleming, O'Bryan & Fleming, Ft. Lauderdale, Fla., for defendants.
FINAL ORDER, FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
Those who won our independence believed ... that freedom to think as you will and to speak as you think are means indispensible to the discovery and spread of political truth; ... that public discussion is a political duty; and that this should be a fundamental principle of American government.... Believing in the power of reason as applied through public discussion, they eschewed silence coerced by law — the argument of force in its worst form.1
THIS ACTION was brought by Plaintiff, Douglas M. Jones, a resident of Key West, Florida, alleging a violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Specifically, Plaintiff contends that, shortly after being called to testify on the issue of senior citizen discounts on garbage and sewer fees, he was unlawfully prevented from presenting his views at a public meeting of the City Commission of Key West by the Mayor of Key West, Richard Heyman acting under color of state law. Mr. Jones was silenced, removed from the City Commission Chambers by force pursuant to the Mayor's order, taken into custody, and arrested. He claims that these actions violated his rights under the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution and seeks injunctive and declaratory relief against the City of Key West, as well as damages.
Count I seeks to permanently enjoin the City of Key West and its Mayor from enforcing Key West City Ordinance No. 85-1. Plaintiff contends that the ordinance is unconstitutionally vague and overbroad, lacking "precise, objective, and narrowly pinpointed standards controlling the presiding officer's or a majority of the City Commissioners' exercise of discretion in their determination as to what speech shall constitute a disturbance." Complaint ¶ 13(d).
Count II claims damages against the City of Key West and Richard Heyman. Plaintiff asserts that the Defendants' actions violated his First Amendment rights as well as his rights under the due process and equal protection clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment. Plaintiff seeks compensatory damages for his injuries under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He maintains that his removal from the City Commission Chambers and subsequent arrest caused him to suffer "embarrassment, public humiliation, emotional distress, mental pain and suffering, and injury to his reputation." Complaint ¶ 20. Additionally Plaintiff seeks punitive damages, claiming that the actions of Defendant Heyman were "willful, wanton, malicious and committed with complete disregard for the rights of the Plaintiff and others similarly situated." Complaint ¶ 22. Plaintiff also seeks costs, reasonable attorney's fees and such other relief as the Court may deem equitable and just.
Mr. Jones' Complaint was tried before the Court without a jury, and pursuant to Rule 52(a), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, we make the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law.
1. The Plaintiff, Douglas M. Jones is currently, and was at all times relevant to this action a resident of Key West, Florida. He operates a fumigating company in Key West.
2. On the day of February 5, 1985, a City Commission meeting was convened. The Defendant, Richard A. Heyman, the Mayor of Key West, presided over this meeting.
3. On the agenda for this meeting was a proposal that senior citizens be allowed a discount on garbage removal and sewer fees.
4. Douglas Jones attended the City Commission meeting and had listed his name as a speaker and the subject of his proposed testimony in advance of the meeting, as required by Commission rules. Jones was the only person who requested time to speak on the subject of garbage and sewer fees. He was recognized by Mayor Heyman to speak on the senior discount matter. After uttering only a few opening words, Mr. Jones' testimony was interrupted by one of the City Commissioners, Mr. Halloran, and by Mayor Heyman. Following a brief, acerbic interchange between Mayor Heyman and Mr. Jones, the Plaintiff was ordered removed and was forcibly expelled from the Commission chamber by a Key West Police Officer.
5. Key West's City Commission meetings are broadcast live on television in Key West and throughout Monroe County. Accordingly, the exchange between Mayor Heyman and Mr. Jones, as well as Mr. Jones' subsequent removal from the chamber, were seen by an unspecified number of television viewers throughout the County. Indeed, according to Mr. Jones' unrefuted testimony at trial, the videotape of the proceedings was replayed several times on television later in the evening of February 5, 1985.
6. The exchange between Mayor Heyman and Mr. Jones is memorialized in a videotape of the Commission proceedings. See videotape, Ex. 1; verbatim transcript, Plaintiff's Ex. 2. The relevant discussion occurred as follows:
7. Mayor Heyman's testimony as to this incident was that he had ordered Mr. Jones' removal from the Commission chamber because Jones had approached the City Commission "in an antagonistic manner." Mayor Heyman further testified that his removal order was intended to "head Mr. Jones off at the pass" rather than risk the possibility that Mr. Jones' attitude toward the City Commission might develop into a confrontation. Further, and perhaps most importantly to our consideration, the Mayor testified that Mr. Jones' comments were irrelevant to the issue pending before the Commission. Authority for Mr. Jones' removal, according to Mayor Heyman, lay in City Ordinance No. 85-1 and in Roberts' Rules of Order.
8. City of Key West Ordinance No. 85-1 states in relevant part:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Dillard v. Baldwin County Bd. of Educ., Civ. A. No. 87-T-1158-N.
......, Lani Guinier, Pamela Karlan, NAACP Legal Defense Fund, New York City, for plaintiffs. . Abram L. Philips, Jr., Reams, Vollmer, ... part of Alabama, and is bordered in part by Mobile Bay to the west and Florida to the east. It has a population, according to the 1980 ......
-
Jones v. Heyman
...to the Plaintiff's first amendment rights," and ordered that the mayor pay $31,500 in punitive damages. 5 Jones v. City of Key West, Fla., 679 F.Supp. 1547, 1563 (S.D.Fla.1988). The mayor presents three issues on appeal. 6 First, he challenges the district court's ruling that his actions im......
-
Dillard v. Crenshaw County
......, Lani Guinier, Pamela Karlan, NAACP Legal Defense Fund, New York City, for plaintiffs. David R. Boyd, Balch & Bingham, ...Attys. Gen., Montgomery, Ala. Herbert D. Jones, Jr., H.R. Burnham, Burnham, Klinefelter, Halsey, Jones & Cater, Anniston, ......