Jones v. City of Opelika Bowden v. City of Fort Smith, Arkansas Jobin v. State of Arizona
| Citation | 319 U.S. 103,87 L.Ed. 1290,63 S.Ct. 890 |
| Decision Date | 03 May 1943 |
| Docket Number | 966,314,Nos. 280,s. 280 |
| Parties | Roscoe JONES, Petitioner, v. CITY OF OPELIKA. Lois BOWDEN and Zada Sanders, Petitioners, v. CITY OF FORT SMITH, ARKANSAS. Charles JOBIN, Appellant, v. The STATE OF ARIZONA. Re |
| Court | United States Supreme Court |
Mr. Hayden C. Covington, of Brooklyn, N.Y., for petitioners.
No appearance for respondents.
The judgments in these cases were affirmed at the October Term, 1941. 316 U.S. 584, 62 S.Ct. 1231, 86 L.Ed. 1691, 141 A.L.R. 514. Because the issues in all three cases were of the same character as those brought before us in other cases by applications for certiorari at the present term, we ordered a reargument and heard these cases together with Nos. 480-487, Murdock et al. v. Pennsylvania. For the reasons stated in the opinion of the Court in Nos. 480-487, 319 U.S. 105, 63 S.Ct. 870, 87 L.Ed. —-, decided this day, and in the dissenting opinions filed in the present cases after the argument last term, the Court is of opinion that the judgment in each case should be reversed. The judgments of this Court heretofore entered in these cases are therefore vacated, and the judgments of the state courts are reversed. So ordered.
Reversed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Mulkey v. Reitman
...S.Ct. 736, 84 L.Ed. 1093; Carlson v. People of State of California, 310 U.S. 106, 60 S.Ct. 746, 84 L.Ed. 1104; Jones v. City of Opelika, 319 U.S. 103, 63 S.Ct. 890, 87 L.Ed. 1290.) The instant case, of course, relates directly to the personal liberties distinguished in Franklin. This was al......
-
Shuttlesworth v. City of Birmingham
...S.Ct. 669, 87 L.Ed. 869 (1943); Largent v. State of Texas, 318 U.S. 418, 63 S.Ct. 667, 87 L.Ed. 873 (1943); Jones v. City of Opelika, 319 U.S. 103, 63 S.Ct. 890, 87 L.Ed. 1290 (1943); Murdock v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105, 63 S.Ct. 870, 87 L.Ed. 1292 (1943); Saia v. People o......
-
Furr v. Town of Swansea
...(1942) (Stone, C.J., dissenting) (Murphy, J., dissenting), vacated and previous dissenting opinions adopted per curiam, 319 U.S. 103, 63 S.Ct. 890, 87 L.Ed. 1290 (1943); Marsh v. Alabama, 326 U.S. 501, 66 S.Ct. 276, 90 L.Ed. 265 (1946); Tucker v. Texas, 326 U.S. 517, 66 S.Ct. 274, 90 L.Ed. ......
-
Konigsberg v. State Bar of California
... ... 14. Cf. Cole v. State of Arkansas, 333 U.S. 196, 201, 68 S.Ct. 514, 517, 92 L.Ed ... 278. A dissenting opinion in Jones v. City of Opelika, 316 U.S. 584, 611, 618, 62 ... ...
-
RELIGIOUS LIBERTY AND JUDICIAL DEFERENCE.
...made wards of the state and of being removed from the custody of their parents."). (114) Jones v. Opelika, 316 U.S. 584 (1942), vacated, 319 U.S. 103 (1943). (115) See id. at 623 (Black, Douglas & Murphy, JJ., dissenting) (arguing that the Gobitis approach "tends to suppress the free ex......
-
Constitutional conversations and new religious movements: a comparative case study.
...321 U.S. 573, 574 (1944); Murdock v. Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105, 106 (1943); Jones v. Opelika, 316 U.S. 584, 585-86 (1942), vacated by 319 U.S. 103 (33.) At times Witnesses would also seek injunctive relief against enforcement of ordinances. See, e.g., Sellers v. Johnson, 163 F.2d 877, 880 ......
-
The fall of free exercise: from 'no law' to compelling interests to any law otherwise valid.
...U.S. 157 (1943); Martin v. City of Struthers, 319 U.S. 141 (1943); Murdock v. Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105 (1943); Jones v. City of Opelika, 319 U.S. 103 (1943); Cantwell v. Conn., 310 U.S. 296 (54) Cantwell, 310 U.S. at 300-01. (55) Id. at 301. (56) Id. at 306-07. (57) Id. at 305-07. (58) Id......
-
The South Counterattacks: the Anti-Naacp Laws
...an investigation of (1939); Schneider v. New Jersey, 308 U.S. 147 (1939); Cantwell v. Connecticut, 310 U.S. 296 (1940); Jones v. Opelika, 319 U.S. 103 (1943), reversing 316 U.S. 584 (1942); Murdock v. Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105 (1943); Martin v. Struthers, 319 U.S. 141 (1943); Thomas v. Col......