Jones v. E G & G Idaho, Inc., 15831

CourtUnited States State Supreme Court of Idaho
Citation110 Idaho 142,715 P.2d 355
Docket NumberNo. 15831,15831
PartiesRobert JONES and Ellis Hamsley, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. E G & G IDAHO, INC., a corporation, Defendant-Respondent.
Decision Date30 January 1986

Page 355

715 P.2d 355
110 Idaho 142
Robert JONES and Ellis Hamsley, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
E G & G IDAHO, INC., a corporation, Defendant-Respondent.
No. 15831.
Supreme Court of Idaho.
Jan. 30, 1986.
ORDER

The Appellants having filed a PETITION FOR REVIEW on October 22, 1985 and a supporting LETTER BRIEF on November 6, 1985 of the Opinion of the Court of Appeals filed October 2, 1985, 109 Idaho 400, 707 P.2d 511; Therefore, good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Appellants' PETITION FOR REVIEW be, and hereby is, GRANTED as to all issues presented on appeal.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondent shall file a Brief in response to the Brief filed by Appellants in support of the PETITION FOR REVIEW within twenty-one (21) days from the date of this Order. Appellants shall file any Reply Brief within fourteen (14) days from the date of filing of Respondent's Brief.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court of Appeals Case No. 15831 is CLOSED and Supreme Court Case No. 16338 shall be used on all future filings in this proceeding.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • State v. Byington, 23273
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Idaho
    • 29 d5 Maio d5 1998
    ...the evidence was arguably prejudicial, as with most probative evidence, our inquiry is the unfairness of the prejudice. State v. Palmer, 110 Idaho 142, 146, 715 P.2d 355, 359 (Ct.App.1985). On review, we conclude that any unfair prejudice resulting from this evidence did not substantially o......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT