Jones v. Jones
| Court | Appellate Court of Illinois |
| Writing for the Court | MR. PRESIDING FRIEND |
| Citation | Jones v. Jones, 32 Ill.App.2d 64, 176 N.E.2d 635 (Ill. App. 1961) |
| Decision Date | 08 September 1961 |
| Docket Number | Gen. No. 48,349. |
| Parties | Evelyn S. Jones, Appellee, v. J. Edward Jones, Appellant. |
J. Edward Jones, of Elmwood Park, for appellant.
Friedman, Friedman & Armstrong, of Chicago, for appellee.
(Abstract of Decision.)
Opinion by MR. PRESIDING JUSTICE FRIEND.
Orders affirmed.
Not to be published in full.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
5 cases
-
Smolinski v. Vojta
...195 (1992) (precluding challenge to attorney fees in a divorce proceeding under a section 2-1401 petition); accord Jones v. Jones, 32 Ill.App.2d 64, 176 N.E.2d 635 (1961) (abstract of Finally, were we not required to dismiss this appeal on jurisdictional grounds, we would still be compelled......
-
Wells v. Kern
...within the time fixed by the Act, and its provisions cannot be invoked as a substitute for a party's right to appeal. Jones v. Jones, 32 Ill.App.2d 64, 176 N.E.2d 635.' (In re Village of Willowbrook, 42 Ill.App.2d 432, 437, 192 N.E.2d 553, Also see, for the same proposition: Jones v. Jones,......
-
Village of Willowbrook, In re
...within the time fixed by the Act, and its provisions cannot be invoked as a substitute for a party's right to appeal. Jones v. Jones, 32 Ill.App.2d 64, 176 N.E.2d 635. Here Carlsons' petition shows no facts which if known to the trial court when the annexation petition was validated in 1961......
-
Schwarz' Estate, In re
...of the July 31 motion, though expanded in detail and accompanied by extensive argument and citation of authorities. Jones v. Jones, 32 Ill.App.2d 64, 176 N.E.2d 635. It also prays for the same relief as the motion of July 31 except that it is directed to the vacating of the order of October......
Get Started for Free
