Jones v. Lawless
Decision Date | 26 March 1956 |
Docket Number | No. 5-898,5-898 |
Citation | 226 Ark. 110,288 S.W.2d 324 |
Parties | A. M. JONES, Appellant, v. Henry LAWLESS, Appellee. |
Court | Arkansas Supreme Court |
Gordon B. Carlton, DeQueen, for appellant.
Geo. E. Steel, Nashville, for appellee.
A petition signed by 63 qualified electors was filed in the Pike County Court for a special election in Pike County School DistrictNo. 1'for electing one member to the County Board of Education in Zone 4 Pike County, § 80-302 Ark.Stats.1947.'On March 30, 1955, this petition was granted by the County Court and an election was ordered to be held on April 30, 1955, at such place or places as the Board of Election Commissioners might designate.In apt time Pike County School DistrictNo. 1 published notice setting out that one of its purposes was 'to elect one County Board Member from Zone 4 for a regular term of 5 years.'Kirby School DistrictNo. 32 had caused to be published a similar notice for the same purpose.Following these notices the special election was held in accordance with the County Court order.Appellant says in his brief, 'The special election was held in School DistrictNo. 1 and Zone 4 of Pike County pursuant to the order of the County Court.'The Board of Election Commissioners on April 4, 1955, designated the Langley School House Building as the polling place in Pike County School DistrictNo. 1 and Zone 4, for the special election to be held on April 30, 1955.Thereafter (April 15, 1955) the Board of Directors of Kirby School DistrictNo. 32 gave notice that a special election would be held in Zone 4, School District 32, on April 30, 1955, and the Daisy School Building was designated as the polling place.The election was held and appellant Jones received a majority of the votes cast at the Langley box and appellee Lawless received a majority of the votes cast at the Daisy box.It is conceded that Lawless received a majority of the combined votes cast at Langley and Daisy boxes.
Pike County, in April 1941, was divided into four zones under Act 327 of 1941, Ark.Stats. § 80-201, and in that zoning order Kirby School District 32 was placed in Zone 3 and Daisy School District in Zone 4.In an order of the County Board of Education, February 28, 1949, Daisy School District 37 was dissolved and its territory annexed to Kirby School District 32 in Pike County.
In due course the Pike County Board of Election Commissioners, on May 4, 1955, filed with the Clerk of the County Court a report and certificate of the result of said election: that appellee Lawless had received 95 votes and Jones 66 votes in the special election, and that Lawless had been elected County Board Member for the regular term of five years from Zone 4.Thereafter on May 10, 1955, the County Court entered an order which contained this recital: ...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Jones v. Dixon, 5-1297
...and inquiring into the qualifications of the electors and other matters affecting the validity of the ballots.' See also Jones v. Lawless, Ark., 288 S.W.2d 324. The Constitution requires the county court to make a finding as to the number of votes cast for and against the proposal submitted......
-
Adams v. Dixie School Dist. No. 7
...§ 80-324), requires that we hold that jurisdiction of all school election contests was vested in the circuit courts. Cf. Jones v. Lawless, 226 Ark. 110, 288 S.W.2d 324. In McLeod v. Richardson, supra, we were faced with a similar situation. We noted there that the General Assembly appeared ......
- Lee-Phillips Drainage Dist. v. Beaver Bayou Drainage Dist., LEE-PHILLIPS