Jones v. Merrimack Val. School Dist.

Decision Date30 March 1966
Citation218 A.2d 55,107 N.H. 144
CourtNew Hampshire Supreme Court
PartiesKenneth W. JONES v. MERRIMACK VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT et al.

Kenneth W. Jones (by brief), pro se.

Upton, Sanders & Upton, Richard F. Upton, Concord, for defendant.

KENISON, Chief Justice.

A petition for a declaratory judgment (RSA 491:22) is a proper method of determining the legality of a proposed expenditure of public funds (Leavitt v. Town of North Hampton, 98 N.H. 193, 96 A.2d 554) and this applies to towns, school districts, village districts and other forms of municipal government. Town of Lisbon v. Lisbon Village District, 104 N.H. 255, 183 A.2d 250; Dresden School District v. Hanover School District, 105 N.H. 286, 198 A.2d 656. The fact that the plaintiff's claims could be enforced by some other proceeding, 'does not necessarily preclude their determination by a petition for declaratory judgment.' Hermer v. City of Dover, 105 N.H. 108, 110, 192 A.2d 624, 625.

I. The first question is whether the Penacook School District may lawfully become a part of the defendant district under the provisions of RSA ch. 195 as amended. We conclude that it may. The plaintiff contends that Penacook School District, also known as Penacook Union School District, is ineligible to join the new cooperative school district because it is not a town school district. The short answer is that it is not required to be a town school district to join the cooperative school district. This is evident from the definition in RSA 195:1 I which in pertinent part reads as follows: "Cooperative school district' means a district composed of two or more school districts of the state associated together under the provisions of this act * * *.' The fact that the definition of a school district under RSA ch. 195-A; Laws 1963, 277:1, relating to Authorized Regional Enrollment (Area) Schools, includes a town school district, as well as other types of districts, is no reason to insert the same definition by implication in RSA ch. 195.

The Penacook School District is an independent, self-governing district with a school board although including the same territory, with minor variations, as Ward 1 of the city of Concord. Laws 1907, c. 290; Laws 1909, c. 239; Laws 1935, c. 313. Its status is not in doubt. Clough v. Osgood, 87 N.H. 444, 182 A. 169; Petition of Harris, 88 N.H. 198, 185 A. 651. The reference to 'towns' in RSA 195:15-a, which relates to 'state building aid,' was not intended to prevent a portion of a city which constitutes an independent school district such as the Penacook School District from joining in a cooperative school district. RSA 21:5; Attorney General v. Lowell, 67 N.H. 198, 38 A. 270. See RSA 195:1 V. We know of no legal or procedural bar to prevent the Penacook School District from becoming a part of the defendant district and functioning thereunder. Monadnock Regional School District v. Towns of Fitzwilliam, 105 N.H. 487, 495, 203 A.2d 46. See Sargent v. Union School District, 63 N.H. 528, 2 A. 641.

II. The substance of the second question is whether the Loudon School District may lawfully join the defendant district even though it is not territorially contiguous. Loudon is separated from Penacook by the intervening territory of Ward 2 in Concord. The plaintiff contends that the noncontiguous territory of Loudon cannot be joined to the cooperative school district as a general principle of municipal law (1 McQuillin, Municipal Corporations, s. 7.20) and that it violates RSA 195:2 I which requires that a cooperative school district must be a 'natural social and economic region.'

Assuming for the purposes of argument that contiguity of territory is the general rule for the incorporation and annexation of municipal governments and that noncontiguity is the exception (Rhyne, Municipal Law, pp. 15, 33-36 (1957)), the statute in the present case requires only that the new cooperative school district shall be 'a natural social and economic region.' RSA 195:2 I. That this statute does not require absolute and complete territorial contiguity is further indicated by the provision that the region shall have 'an adequate minimum taxable valuation and a number of pupils sufficient to permit the efficient use of school facilities within the district and to provide improved instruction.' RSA 195:2, I. These additional guidelines indicate that factors other than contiguity are important in connection with the formation of cooperative school districts. See In re DeJonge's Petition, (Neb.) 139 N.W.2d 296 (1966). History, geography, past educational practices and educational efficiency are and continue to play an important part in determining what constitutes 'a natural social and economic region' for cooperative school districts. In Monadnock Regional School District v. Towns of Fitzwilliam, 105 N.H. 487, 203 A.2d 46, the cooperative school district was composed of territory not wholly contiguous.

The statutory emphasis is placed on scholars, teachers and school buildings rather than trees, acres and territorial contiguity. 'Proximity' may be a substitute for contiguity in certain cases. RSA 195:16 I. This conclusion is further buttressed by RSA 195:2 II, inserted by Laws 1963, 258:4, which provides that the over-all state plan for cooperative school districts 'shall be reasonably compatible with the areas of the several supervisory unions.' In this connection it is interesting to note that there are six supervisory unions in the state which have noncontiguous territory in certain cases because of some intervening urban territory and in other cases because of the intervening territory of unincorporated land. As a practical matter the new cooperative high school in Penacook will be closer to Loudon than the present Concord high school which the Loudon students now attend. All of these factors add up to the proposition that the defendant cooperative school district was properly found to constitute 'a natural social and economic region' within the meaning of RSA 195:2 I We have no doubt that the Loudon school district was properly included in the formation of the defendant district for the reasons already indicated. If doubt exists elsewhere it is put to final rest by RSA 195:18 VI which provides that a...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Riley v. Cochise County
    • United States
    • Arizona Court of Appeals
    • June 11, 1969
    ...248 Ala. 22, 26 So.2d 108 (1946); City of Joplin v. Jasper County, 349 Mo. 441, 161 S.W.2d 411 (1942); Jones v. Merrimack Valley School District, 107 N.H. 144, 218 A.2d 55 (1966); 2 Anderson, Supra, § 677. A plaintiff, however, in order to be entitled to relief, must have a legal, protectib......
  • Laconia Bd. of Ed. v. City of Laconia, No. 6353
    • United States
    • New Hampshire Supreme Court
    • December 23, 1971
    ... ... the respective powers of the city council and the school board of education these guidelines are necessarily general ... RSA 186:5; Jones v. Merrimack Valley School District, 107 N.H. 144, ... ...
  • Town of Alton v. Fisher
    • United States
    • New Hampshire Supreme Court
    • May 31, 1974
    ...doubts about the validity of the zoning amendments. Hermer v. Dover, 105 N.H. 108, 192 A.2d 624 (1963); Jones v. Merrimack Valley School Dist., 107 N.H. 144, 218 A.2d 55 (1966). A writ of mandamus, however, is an extraordinary remedy and, where other adequate relief is available, it is not ......
  • Tyler Advertising, Inc. v. Lamprey
    • United States
    • New Hampshire Supreme Court
    • March 30, 1966
    ... ... Jones, 69 N.H. 305, 41 A. 352; Dufton v. Mechanicks Nat. Bank, 95 ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT