Jones v. Pennsylvania Bd. of Probation and Parole

Decision Date01 June 1979
Citation43 Pa.Cmwlth. 169,401 A.2d 1247
PartiesLawrence JONES, Petitioner, v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, Respondent.
CourtPennsylvania Commonwealth Court

Submitted June 1, 1979.

Lawrence Jones, for petitioner.

Robert A. Greevy, Asst. Atty. Gen., Pennsylvania Bd. of Probation and Parole, Harrisburg, for respondent.

Before BOWMAN, President Judge, and CRUMLISH, Jr., WILKINSON MENCER, ROGERS, BLATT, DiSALLE, CRAIG and MacPHAIL, JJ.

OPINION

DiSALLE Judge.

Lawrence Jones (Petitioner) has filed a Motion for Review, which we shall treat as a petition for review, challenging the action of the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole (Board) in recommitting him as a convicted parole violator. Each side has filed motions for summary judgment.

Petitioner was sentenced to concurrent terms of two to ten years for assault with intent to commit sodomy and one and one-half to three years for corrupting a minor, with an effective date of November 7, 1969, a minimum of November 7, 1971, and a maximum of November 7, 1979. He was paroled on August 28, 1972 and then arrested on February 13, 1975, for possession of narcotics. The Board afforded him a preliminary/detention hearing on February 25, 1975 and released him from custody under parole supervision on March 6, 1975.

Petitioner was again arrested on May 12, 1975, this time for aggravated and simple assault, possession of an offensive weapon and possession of narcotics. He was found not guilty of these offenses, but on December 8, 1975, Federal authorities lodged a warrant against him for dispensing narcotics. He was convicted on January 14, 1976, and sentenced to three years in a Federal institution.

The Board afforded Petitioner a full revocation hearing on April 9 1976, and decided to recommit him as a convicted parole violator when available. Its agents took him into custody on November 11, 1978, when he received Federal parole, and transferred him to the State Correctional Institution at Graterford. Disallowing credit for time spent on parole, but allowing credit for the time spent incarcerated pursuant to its detainer warrant, the Board recomputed Petitioner's sentence and modified his maximum to read June 5, 1984.

Petitioner argues first that by lodging a detainer warrant against him based on the new criminal charges, the Board unconstitutionally denied him the right to bail. We disagree. The law is clear that lodging a detainer warrant against an arrested parolee who has posted bail on the new charge does not violate his constitutional rights. Woodall v Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, 38 Pa.Cmwlth. 642, 394 A.2d 1061 (1978).

Petitioner next argues that the sentence imposed for the crime committed while on parole and the original sentence should be served concurrently not consecutively. Again, we must disagree. Section 21.1(a) of the Act of August 6, 1941 P.L. 861, added by Section 5 of the Act of August 24, 1951, P.L. 1401, As amended, 61 P.S. § 331.21a(a), provides...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT