Jones v. Shehee Ford Wagon & Harness Co., Inc.
Decision Date | 02 November 1934 |
Docket Number | 4838 |
Citation | 157 So. 309 |
Parties | JONES v. SHEHEE FORD WAGON & HARNESS CO., Inc., et al |
Court | Court of Appeal of Louisiana — District of US |
Rehearing granted Dec. 5, 1934.
Irion & Switzer, Henry F. Turner, and Dickson & Denny, all of Shreveport, for appellants.
Kennon & Kitchens, of Minden, for appellee.
Plaintiff instituted this suit against the Shehee Ford Wagon & Harness Company, Incorporated, of Shreveport, and its insurer, Continental Casualty Company, seeking judgment against them, in solido, in the sum of $ 7,500, with interest and costs. Later plaintiff filed a supplemental and amended petition seeking an increase in the amount sued for from $ 7,500 to $ 11,500.
The suit is based upon an alleged cause of action wherein plaintiff set forth that on Friday, June 16, 1933, he was riding as a guest in a school truck with one Joe Kight on the White Hall Church road in Claiborne parish, La. He then alleged that as the truck approached the Blackman and Haynesville highway, which crosses the White Hall Church road at right angles, it gradually slowed down and finally came to a stop before entering the intersection, and that a car, driven by one J. M. Tarpley, was approaching on the Blackman-Haynesville highway from the left of the truck and made a sweeping right-hand turn into the White Hall Church road; that the car came over onto the side of the road where the truck was in which plaintiff was sitting, which he alleges was on its right-hand side of the road, and crashed into the truck and injured plaintiff. Plaintiff alleges that J. M. Tarpley, the driver of the car, was an employee of the Shehee Ford Wagon & Harness Company, Incorporated, and that he was at the time on a mission of his master and acting within the scope of his employment. Plaintiff itemized the damages claimed.
The Shehee Ford Wagon & Harness Company, Incorporated, answered the petition of plaintiff denying the material allegations of the petition and alleged, as an affirmative defense, that J. M. Tarpley was not an employee of it, but that he was an independent contractor.
The Continental Casualty Company filed two exceptions, one termed an exception of no cause or right of action, and the other a plea of prematurity, both of which were overruled. It then filed an answer denying the allegations of plaintiff's petition and alleged that J. M. Tarpley was not an employee of the Shehee Ford Wagon & Harness Company, Incorporated, but was an independent contractor.
After trial the lower court rendered judgment in favor of plaintiff and against the defendants, in solido, for $ 2,212.50, from which judgment both defendants have perfected an appeal.
It is admitted in this court that the accident in which plaintiff alleges he was injured was caused by the gross negligence of J. M. Tarpley, the driver of the car; therefore, the only defense urged in this court by the Shehee Ford Wagon & Harness Company, Incorporated, is that of independent contractor.
The facts of the employment of Tarpley by the said Wagon & Harness Company can best be shown by quoting the testimony of Mr. Shehee, president of said company, which is the only testimony regarding the contract of employment of Mr. Tarpley. It is as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Talbott Big Foot, Inc., Matter of, 88-3612
...Insurance Co. of Boston, 171 So. 471, 476 (La.App.1937); Robbins v. Short, 165 So. 512 (La.App.1936); Jones v. Shehee Ford Wagon & Harness Co., 157 So. 309, 315 (La.App.1934); Holland v. Owners Automobile Insurance Co., 155 So. 780, 781 (La.App.1934); Boujon v. Volunteers of America, 151 So......
-
Blanchard v. Ogima
...158 So. 264 (La.App.2nd Cir. 1935); McAllister v. Jackson Brewing Co., 6 So.2d 179 (La.App. Orleans 1942); Jones v. Shehee-Ford Wagon & Harness Co., 157 So. 309 (La.App.2nd Cir. 1934). It is the Right of control of the time and physical activities in the other party and the existence of a c......
-
Ravare v. McCormick & Co.
... ... , and Gulfrey Clayton against McCormick & Co., Inc., ... and Eldren J. Lacombe, carrier and ... a two-horse wagon in which plaintiffs were riding ... of Shea v. Reems, 36 La.Ann. 966 and Jones v ... Shehee Ford Wagon & Harness Company ... ...
-
State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co. v. Grimmer
...concur in the decree against the insurer because I feel that reasonable notice was given to the insurer. See Jones v. Shehee Ford Wagon & Harness Co., La. App., 157 So. 309, affirmed by Supreme Court on writs in 183 La. 293, 163 So. "I cannot agree, however, that because of what we said in ......