Jones v. State
| Docket Number | CR-09-990 |
| Decision Date | 22 October 2020 |
The Supreme Court denied Petitioner's pro se second petition to reinvest jurisdiction in the trial court to consider a petition for writ of error coram nobis, holding that none of Petitioner's claims established a ground for the writ
In his petition, Petitioner asserted that the prosecution withheld material evidence in violation of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and withheld facts regarding information obtained during the police investigation. Petitioner later filed a motion...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
5 cases
-
McFerrin v. State
...does not present any evidence extrinsic to the record that was hidden from the defense or unknown at the time of trial. Jones v. State , 2020 Ark. 338, 609 S.W.3d 375. Although McFerrin claims he was unaware that Hayward would testify, the fact that Hayward did testify at trial is not extri......
-
Jones v. Payne
...information. This court determined that Jones failed to state a basis for issuance of the writ and denied the petition. Jones v. State , 2020 Ark. 338, 609 S.W.3d 375.On March 19, 2020, Jones filed in the Chicot County Circuit Court, the county where he is incarcerated, the pro se petition ......
-
Wells v. State
...present evidence extrinsic to the record that the State withheld from the defense or was unknown at the time of trial. Jones v. State , 2020 Ark. 338, 609 S.W.3d 375. Wells does not allege facts about his confession or the witness testimony that were unknown to him at the time of trial. See......
-
Williams v. State
...credibility of witnesses constitute a direct attack on the judgment and are not cognizable in a coram nobis proceeding. Jones v. State , 2020 Ark. 338, 609 S.W.3d 375. Finally, Williams contends that he was denied due process and a fair trial because the evidence presented at trial was inco......
Get Started for Free