Jones v. State

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
Writing for the CourtTYSON, J.
Citation136 Ala. 118,34 So. 236
Decision Date21 April 1903
PartiesJONES v. STATE.

34 So. 236

136 Ala. 118

JONES
v.
STATE.

Supreme Court of Alabama

April 21, 1903


Appeal from Hall county court; W. C. Christian, Judge.

Cad Jones was convicted of selling liquor without a license, and he appeals. Reversed.

The indictment under which the appellant in this case was tried and convicted was as follows: "(1) The grand jury of said county charge that before the finding of this indictment that Cad Jones did, within the county of Hale, in the state of Alabama, sell spirituous, vinous, or malt liquors, without a license, and contrary to law. (2) The grand jury of said county further charge that before the finding of this indictment that Cad Jones did, within the county of Hale, in the state of Alabama, sell, give away to, or procure for Mark Otts, or did aid the said Mark Otts in procuring, vinous, spirituous, or malt liquors, or intoxicating drinks, bitters, or beverages, without a license, and contrary to law, against the peace and dignity of the state of Alabama." The defendant demurred to the first count of the indictment upon the ground that it fails to state the name of the person to whom the defendant is charged with having sold spirituous, vinous, or malt liquors without a license, and contrary to law. This demurrer was overruled. The defendant then moved the court to require the solicitor for the state to furnish him with a bill of particulars to show the time and place of the sale of the liquor charged in the indictment. The facts in reference to this motion are sufficiently stated in the opinion. The court overruled the motion, and the defendant duly excepted. J. W. Otts, a witness for the state, testified that within 12 months before the finding of the indictment in this case the defendant sold to Mark Otts, a brother of the witness, a quart of whisky; that he (the witness) saw the defendant and Mark Otts go to the express office in Greensboro, in Hale county, and come from the express office with a negro, carrying a box for them; that they went to the defendant's room, where the defendant had the negro to open the box, and that the negro took from the box a quart bottle of whisky, and set it on top of the box, and then left; that Mark Otts picked up the quart bottle of whisky so placed on the box, and put it in his pocket, and then gave the defendant 75 cents, and told him he would give him the balance as soon as he got it; that then Mark Otts left the room, carrying the whisky with him. The defendant, as a witness in his own behalf, testified that he never, at the time mentioned by the witness or any other time, sold any whisky to said Mark Otts; that Mark Otts had a key to his (the defendant's) room, and he had also in the defendant's room a private locker, to which he had a key. Thereupon the defendant was asked by his attorney the following question: "What did Mark Otts keep in that locker which he had in your room and to which he had a key?" The court sustained the objection of the state to this question, and to this ruling the defendant duly excepted. Counsel for the defendant then stated to the court that he proposed to prove to the jury by the defendant that at the time fixed by the state's witness as to the sale charged in the indictment Mark Otts kept wine and whisky, his individual property, in the locker in the defendant's room; but upon objection on the part of the state to making such proof the court sustained the objection, and to this ruling the defendant duly excepted. Thereupon defendant was asked by his counsel the following question: "State whether at that time Mark Otts kept in that locker wine and whisky." The state objected to this question, the court sustained the objection, and the defendant duly excepted. During the argument of the defendant's counsel to the jury he used the following language: "The proof shows that Cad Jones and Mark Otts went to the express office together, and that when they came out they were with a negro, who had a box; that they went immediately to Jones' room, to which Mark Otts had a key, and in which he had a locker, to which he also had a key, and there the box was opened, and one bottle of whisky was seen by witness J. W. Otts, who testifies that he saw Mark Otts take the bottle and put...

To continue reading

Request your trial
29 practice notes
  • Addington v. State, 6 Div. 16
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Appeals
    • September 7, 1916
    ...§ 7161, form 59) is sufficient, and the demurrer thereto was properly overruled (Toliver v. State, 142 Ala. 3, 38 So. 801; Jones v. State, 136 Ala. 118, 34 So. 236; Noles v. State, 24 Ala. 672; Headley v. State, 106 Ala. 109, 17 So. 714; Pearce v. State, 115 Ala. 115, 22 So. 502; Bobbitt v.......
  • Johnson v. State, 3 Div. 340
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • May 18, 1976
    ...where the granting of a bill of particulars is permissible, such rests within the discretion of the trial judge. In Jones v. State, 136 Ala. 118, 34 So.2d 236, our Supreme Court, at p. 238 '. . . Whatever may be the practice in those jurisdictions with respect to demanding a bill of particu......
  • Broughton v. Brewer, Civ. A. No. 5266-68-T
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 11th Circuit. United States District Court of Northern District of Alabama
    • March 13, 1969
    ...a bill of particulars so long as the indictment or information is drawn in compliance with the language of the Code. Jones v. State, 1903, 136 Ala. 118, 34 So. 236. Accord: Danley v. State, 1949, 34 Ala.App. 412, 41 So.2d 414, 415. See Brannon v. State, 1917, 16 Ala.App. 259, 76 So. 991 (va......
  • Gayden v. State, 3 Div. 722
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Alabama
    • May 12, 1955
    ...672; Mayo v. State, 30 Ala. 32; Cochran v. State, 30 Ala. 546; Bailey v. Stat, 99 Ala. 145 [13 So. 566]; Jones v. State, 136 Ala. 122, 123, 34 So. 236; Guarreno v. State, [148 Ala. 637] 42 So. 'Nor was it necessary to allege the name of the person to whom the liquor was sold, nor the partic......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
29 cases
  • Addington v. State, 6 Div. 16
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Appeals
    • September 7, 1916
    ...§ 7161, form 59) is sufficient, and the demurrer thereto was properly overruled (Toliver v. State, 142 Ala. 3, 38 So. 801; Jones v. State, 136 Ala. 118, 34 So. 236; Noles v. State, 24 Ala. 672; Headley v. State, 106 Ala. 109, 17 So. 714; Pearce v. State, 115 Ala. 115, 22 So. 502; Bobbitt v.......
  • Johnson v. State, 3 Div. 340
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • May 18, 1976
    ...where the granting of a bill of particulars is permissible, such rests within the discretion of the trial judge. In Jones v. State, 136 Ala. 118, 34 So.2d 236, our Supreme Court, at p. 238 '. . . Whatever may be the practice in those jurisdictions with respect to demanding a bill of particu......
  • Broughton v. Brewer, Civ. A. No. 5266-68-T
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 11th Circuit. United States District Court of Northern District of Alabama
    • March 13, 1969
    ...a bill of particulars so long as the indictment or information is drawn in compliance with the language of the Code. Jones v. State, 1903, 136 Ala. 118, 34 So. 236. Accord: Danley v. State, 1949, 34 Ala.App. 412, 41 So.2d 414, 415. See Brannon v. State, 1917, 16 Ala.App. 259, 76 So. 991 (va......
  • Gayden v. State, 3 Div. 722
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Alabama
    • May 12, 1955
    ...672; Mayo v. State, 30 Ala. 32; Cochran v. State, 30 Ala. 546; Bailey v. Stat, 99 Ala. 145 [13 So. 566]; Jones v. State, 136 Ala. 122, 123, 34 So. 236; Guarreno v. State, [148 Ala. 637] 42 So. 'Nor was it necessary to allege the name of the person to whom the liquor was sold, nor the partic......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT