Jones v. State
Citation | 753 So.2d 1174 |
Parties | Aaron Lee JONES v. STATE. |
Decision Date | 30 April 1999 |
Court | Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals |
Dewey Ballantine, Vincent R. Fitzpatrick, Jr., and Heather K. McDevitt, New York City, New York; and Stephen Clark Jackson, Birmingham, for appellant.
Bill Pryor, atty. gen., and Michael B. Billingsley, asst. atty. gen., for appellee.
Alabama Supreme Court 1981775.
This case was originally assigned to another judge on the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals. It was reassigned to me on February 15, 1999. Although I was not a member of this Court when this case was orally argued, I have reviewed the recorded audiotapes and videotapes of the argument.
Aaron Lee Jones appeals from the denial of his petition for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Rule 32, Ala.R.Crim.P, challenging his 1982 conviction for capital murder. Jones was originally convicted of murder made capital because two or more human beings were intentionally killed by one or a series of acts. He was sentenced to death in 1979. See § 13-11-2(a)(10) (now repealed). This court, however, reversed the trial court's judgment and ordered a new trial pursuant to Beck v. Alabama, 447 U.S. 625, 100 S.Ct. 2382, 65 L.Ed.2d 392 (1980), and Ritter v. State, 403 So.2d 154 (Ala.1981). See Jones v. State, 403 So.2d 1 (Ala.Cr.App.1981). Jones was retried, and on December 10, 1982, he was again convicted of capital murder and sentenced to death. After remanding Jones's case for the trial court to clarify whether it had found any mitigating circumstances and whether the aggravating circumstances outweighed the mitigating circumstances, this Court, on January 22, 1985, affirmed Jones's conviction and sentence of death. Jones v. State, 520 So.2d 543 (Ala. Cr.App.1984). The Alabama Supreme Court affirmed this court's judgment on January 8, 1988. Ex parte Jones, 520 So.2d 553 (Ala.1988). On October 3, 1988, the United States Supreme Court denied certiorari review. Jones v. Alabama, 488 U.S. 871, 109 S.Ct. 182, 102 L.Ed.2d 151 (1988). On March 6, 1990, Jones filed a Rule 32 petition attacking his conviction and sentence. On May 13, 1995, Jones supplemented his original petition with an amended petition. The trial court held an evidentiary hearing on the allegations in Jones's petition on November 13-14, 1995, and, in a thorough 30-page order, denied all relief on June 10, 1996.
The essential facts of this case were recited by this court in Jones v. State, supra:
Initially, we note that on direct appeal all issues were scrutinized, including those issues reviewable only under the "plain error" doctrine. There is no plain error review in an appeal from the denial of a Rule 32 petition.
Jones claims that the trial court erred in adopting the State's proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law in its order denying his Rule 32 petition. Jones specifically asserts that adopting the State's findings was error, because, he says, those findings...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Lewis v. State
...plausible defenses be made." Id., 466 U.S. at 686, 104 S. Ct. at 2063.'"Washington, 95 So. 3d at 40-41 (quoting Jones v. State, 753 So. 2d 1174, 1191 (Ala. Crim. App. 1999)). As noted, the circuit court found that Parkman did not think the report would help Lewis's defense. Although Lewis n......
-
Miller v. State, CR-08-1413
...593 So. 2d 123, 126 (Ala. Crim. App. 1991). See also Dobyne v. State, 805 So. 2d 733, 741 (Ala. Crim. App. 2000); Jones v. State, 753 So. 2d 1174, 1180 (Ala. Crim. App. 1999)."More recently in Hyde v. State, 950 So. 2d 344 (Ala. Crim. App. 2006), we stated:"'[T]his Court has repeatedly uphe......
-
Ingram v. State
...cert. denied, 593 So.2d 123 (Ala.), cert. denied, 504 U.S. 991, 112 S.Ct. 2981, 119 L.Ed.2d 599 (1992).' "Quoting Jones v. State, 753 So.2d 1174, 1180 (Ala.Cr.App.1999). As we more recently stated in Hyde v. State, 950 So.2d 344, 371 (Ala.Crim.App.2006):"Hyde contends that the circuit court......
-
Lewis v. State
...plausible defenses be made." Id., 466 U.S. at 686, 104 S. Ct. at 2063.’ " Washington, 95 So. 3d at 40–41 (quoting Jones v. State, 753 So. 2d 1174, 1191 (Ala. Crim. App. 1999) ).As noted, the circuit court found that Parkman did not think the report would help Lewis's defense. Although Lewis......
-
What a poor defense! Exploring the ineffectiveness of counsel for the poor and searching for a solution.
...928 S.W.2d at 505-506. (72) Stanberry v. State, 813 So. 2d 932, 935 (Ala. Crim. App. 2000). (73) Id. at 936. (74) Jones v. State, 753 So. 2d 1174, 1178 (Ala. Crim. App (75) Id. at 1183. (76) Id. at 1185. (77) Thomas v. State, 766 So. 2d 860 (Ala. Crim. App. 1998). (78) Id. at 953. (79) Id. ......