Jones v. State
Decision Date | 26 November 1919 |
Docket Number | (No. 5586.) |
Citation | 216 S.W. 183 |
Parties | JONES v. STATE. |
Court | Texas Court of Criminal Appeals |
Appeal from District Court, Houston County; John S. Prince, Judge.
Bud Jones was convicted of violating the local option law, and he appeals.Affirmed.
Alvin M. Owsley, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
Appellant was convicted of violating the local option law and awarded one year in the penitentiary.
The state's case is made by the testimony of the alleged purchaser.Appellant offered no testimony.The state's witness testified he bought a bottle of whisky, or what he believed to be whisky, from the appellant, and the facts and circumstances show that it was whisky.It seems the witness became very much intoxicated from the use of the contents of the bottle.We think the evidence is sufficient.
Appellant asked the court for a continuance on account of the absence of his mother, by whom he expected to prove an alibi.There was no process issued for the mother, and he relied upon her promise to attend court to testify in his behalf....
To continue reading
Request your trialUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Elms v. State
...v. State, 94 Tex. Cr. R. 599, 252 S. W. 534. The intoxicating quality of the liquid was provable by circumstances. See Jones v. State, 86 Tex. Cr. R. 261, 216 S. W. 183; Cabiale v. United States (C. C. A.) 276 F. 769; People v. Emmons, 178 Mich. 126, 144 N. W. 479, Ann. Cas. 1915D, 425; Und......
- Jenkins v. State