JONES v. State of Ala.
Citation | 43 So.3d 1258 |
Decision Date | 26 October 2007 |
Docket Number | CR-05-0527. |
Court | Supreme Court of Alabama |
Parties | Jeremy Bryan JONES v. STATE of Alabama. |
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED.
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED.
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED.
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED.
Glenn L. Davidson, Mobile; W. Gregory Hughes, Mobile; and Vader Al Pennington, Mobile, for appellant.
Troy King, atty. gen., and Corey L. Maze, asst. atty. gen., for appellee.
The appellant, Jeremy Bryan Jones, was convicted of four counts of capital murder for the killing of Lisa Nichols. The murder was made capital because he committed it during the course of a rape or an attempted rape, see § 13A-5-40(a)(3), Ala. Code 1975; a sexual abuse or an attempted sexual abuse, see § 13A-5-40(a)(8), Ala. Code 1975; a burglary, see § 13A-5-40(a)(4), Ala.Code 1975; and a kidnapping or an attempted kidnapping, see § 13A-5-40(a)(1), Ala.Code 1975. After a sentencing hearing, by a vote of 10-2, the jury recommended that he be sentenced to death. The trial court accepted the jury's recommendation and sentenced him to death. The appellant filed a motion for a new trial, which was denied. This appeal followed.
The appellant raises some arguments on appeal that he did not raise at trial. Although the lack of an objection at trial will not bar our review of an issue in a case involving the death penalty, it will weigh against any claim of prejudice the appellant may raise. See Ex parte Kennedy, 472 So.2d 1106 (Ala.1985). Rule 45A, Ala. R.App. P., provides:
"In all cases in which the death penalty has been imposed, the Court of Criminal Appeals shall notice any plain error or defect in the proceedings under review. . . whenever such error has or probably has adversely affected the substantial right of the appellant."
"[This] plain-error exception to the contemporaneous-objection rule is to be `used sparingly, solely in those circumstances in which a miscarriage of justice would otherwise result.'" United States v. Young, 470 U.S. 1, 15, 105 S.Ct. 1038, 1046, 84 L.Ed.2d 1 (1985) (quoting United States v. Frady, 456 U.S. 152, 163 n. 14, 102 S.Ct. 1584, 1592 n. 14, 71 L.Ed.2d 816 n. 14 (1982)).
The appellant does not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to support his convictions. However, we have reviewed the evidence, and we find that it is sufficient to support the appellant's convictions. The following summary of the relevant facts, as prepared by the trial court, may be helpful to an understanding of this case:
"On Wednesday, September 15, 2004, the same day Hurricane Ivan struck in the Mobile area, Jeremy Jones arrived at the doorstep of Mark and Kim Bentley, a Turnerville couple. The Bentleys previously employed Jones in 1999-2000 and had provided housing for him. The Bentleys actually knew Jones as John Paul Chapman, an alias Jones had assumed during a previous visit to Alabama.
Continuing to hold himself out to be John Chapman, Jones informed the Bentleys that he needed work and a place to live. Accordingly, the couple allowed Jones to stay in their mobile home with their cousin, Scooter Coleman, while they fled the approaching hurricane with their children to relatives in Chickasaw, Alabama.
Instead, this Court will outline some of the most critical evidence.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Miller v. State, CR-08-1413
...'provide guidance as to what is reasonable in terms of counsel's representation, [but] they are notdeterminative.' Jones v. State, 43 So. 3d 1258, 1278 (Ala. Crim. App. 2007) . [7 ]"The danger of adopting the ABA Guidelines as determinative on the issue of a lawyer's effectiveness was discu......
-
Townes v. State
...238 La. 1036, 117 So.2d 583 [ (1960) ]." Elrod v. State, 281 Ala. 331, 334, 202 So.2d 539, 542 (1967) ; see also Jones v. State, 43 So.3d 1258, 1273 (Ala.Crim.App.2007) (same). Thus, "[w]hile an accused's intelligence and literacy are important factors, ... weak intellect or illiteracy alon......
-
Mashburn v. State
...‘provide guidance as to what is reasonable in terms of counsel's representation, [but] they are not determinative.’ Jones v. State, 43 So.3d 1258, 1278 (Ala.Crim.App.2007).“The danger of adopting the ABA Guidelines as determinative on the issue of a lawyer's effectiveness was discussed by t......
- Riley v. State