Jones v. United Parcel Serv., Inc.
| Decision Date | 16 April 2007 |
| Docket Number | No. 06–1099.,06–1099. |
| Citation | Jones v. United Parcel Serv., Inc., 127 S.Ct. 2088, 167 L.Ed.2d 766, 549 U.S. 1340, 75 USLW 3554, 75 USLW 3546 (2007) |
| Parties | Stephen E. JONES, et al., petitioners, v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., et al. |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Case below, 461 F.3d 982.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
6 cases
-
Davison v. City of Minneapolis, Minn
...action by the fire chief. Jones v. United Parcel Serv., Inc., 461 F.3d 982, 992 (8th Cir. 2006), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 127 S.Ct. 2088, 167 L.Ed.2d 766 (2007); Riser v. Target Corp., 458 F.3d 817, 820-21 (8th Cir.2006), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 127 S.Ct. 1382, 167 L.Ed.2d 161 (2007)......
-
Carraher v. Target Corp.
...F.3d 1133, 1136 (8th Cir.2006); Jones v. United Parcel Serv., Inc., 461 F.3d 982, 991 (8th Cir.2006), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 127 S.Ct. 2088, 167 L.Ed.2d 766 (2007); Lee v. Rheem Mfg. Co., 432 F.3d 849, 852-53 (8th 4. On appeal, Carraher does not allege that Target's decision to decentr......
-
Jenkins v. Winter
...reviews for abuse of discretion. Jones v. United Parcel Serv., Inc., 461 F.3d 982, 990 (8th Cir.2006), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 127 S.Ct. 2088, 167 L.Ed.2d 766 (2007). "Local Rule 56.1 places size and content limitations on a non-movant's response to a summary judgment motion." Id. It Su......
-
Timmons v. Deere Credit, Inc., 06–1125.
... ... 06–1125.Supreme Court of the United StatesApril 16, 2007 ... Petition for writ of ... ...
Get Started for Free