Jones v. La Vigne (In re Cranberry Creek Drainage Dist.)
Citation | 202 Wis. 64,231 N.W. 588 |
Parties | IN RE CRANBERRY CREEK DRAINAGE DIST. JONES ET AL. v. LA VIGNE, COUNTY TREASURER, ET AL. |
Decision Date | 11 June 1930 |
Court | United States State Supreme Court of Wisconsin |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Wood County, sustaining a demurrer to the petition. Byron B. Park, Circuit Judge.
In the matter of the Cranberry Creek Drainage District. Petition by Burr W. Jones and others against James A. La Vigne, County Treasurer of Wood County, and others. From an order sustaining defendants' demurrer to the petition, petitioners appeal.--[By Editorial Staff.]
Reversed and remanded, with instructions.
The petition was served on February 12, 1930. Petitioners appeal from an order entered April 29, 1930, which sustains respondents' demurrer to the petition.Goggins, Brazeau & Graves, of Wisconsin Rapids, for appellants.
B. M. Vaughan and Marvin S. King, both of Wisconsin Rapids, for respondents.
[1] The petition, to which a general demurrer was interposed, challenges the constitutionality of section 89.376 passed in 1927, and which reads:
The petitioners are the owners of eight negotiable coupon bonds of the Cranberry creek drainage district. Each is one of a large serial first issue of bonds duly issued April 1, 1907, by this drainage district to provide funds for the construction of a drainage system therein in anticipation of the collection of the several installments of a special assessment against the benefited lands within said district.
The petition alleges that the bonds are past-due and unpaid; that there are delinquent assessments outstanding in said district; that the petitioners are not landholders in the district; that there are other bonds to a large amount outstanding and unpaid; that the lands in the said district vary in quality and value; that there are assessments for benefits still in force in said district in excess of the assessments for construction. Each bond contains among other provisions, the following:
“Both principal and interest hereof being payable in lawful money of the United States of America.”
“* * * And that said series of bonds do not exceed in the aggregate the amount of said special assessments remaining uncollected and unpaid at the time of the issue thereof, and for prompt collection of the several installments of said special assessments, and for the proper disbursement of the proceeds thereof to the payment of said bonds and the interest thereon, the full faith and credit of said district is herby irrevocably pledged.”
The question arises whether, under section 89.376 Stats., the town treasurers in the towns in which the drainage district is located, and the county treasurers of Juneau and Wood counties, have any authority in law to accept such bonds, notes, or coupons in payment of drainage taxes on specified lands in said district.
The respondents admit that the district's financial condition is bad, as is shown by the petition, and will continue to grow worse by...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Rorick v. Board of Com'rs of Everglades Drainage Dist.
...Ct. 1042, 41 L. Ed. 93; Moore v. Gas Securities Co. (C. C. A.) 278 F. 111; Moore v. Otis (C. C. A.) 275 F. 747; In re Cranberry Creek Drainage Dist., 202 Wis. 64, 231 N. W. 588. Section 67 of the 1931 act is also assailed by the supplemental bill, but, as that section depends for its operat......
-
State ex rel. Murphy v. Cherry
... ... within the limits of Big Creek Drainage District No. 15 of ... Craighead ... district and its bondholders. In re Cranberry Creek ... Drain. Dist., 202 Wis. 64, 231 N.W ... ...
-
Straus v. Ketchen
... ... DRAINAGE ... DISTRICTS-IMPROVEMENT ... 785; In ... re Drainage Dist. No. 1, 29 Idaho 377, 161 P. 315; ... Burt v ... In the ... case of In re Cranberry Creek Drainage Dist., 202 ... Wis. 64, 231 N.W ... ...
-
State ex rel. Bldg. Owners & Managers Ass'n of Milwaukee, Inc. v. Adamany
...12, of the Wisconsin Constitution. 2 Applying these constitutional provisions, this court said in In re Cranberry Creek Drainage District v. La Vigne (1930), 202 Wis. 64, 68, 231 N.W. 588, 589: "(A)n act which in any degree, no matter how slightly, modifies the obligation of the contract by......