Jordan's Mut. Aid Ass'n Inc. v. Edwards
Decision Date | 26 March 1936 |
Docket Number | 6 Div. 906 |
Citation | 166 So. 780,232 Ala. 80 |
Parties | JORDAN'S MUT. AID ASS'N Inc., v. EDWARDS. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Jefferson County; John Denson, Judge.
Action for damages by Lula Edwards, as administratrix of the estate of Carrie Washington, deceased, against Jordan's Mutual Aid Association, Inc. From a judgment for plaintiff defendant appeals. Transferred from Court of Appeals.
Reversed and remanded.
p>Page Wilkinson & Wilkinson, of Birmingham, for appellant.
Jas Esdale and John T. Batten, both of Birmingham, for appellee.
Action for damages from breach of the obligations of a burial insurance policy.
Jordan's Mutual Aid Association, Inc., issued a policy to Carrie Washington, whereby, in consideration of the payment of a weekly premium of 21 cents, and on receipt of proof of death etc., the insurer would pay to the mortician named in the policy for furnishing a funeral and services for the insured as provided therein to the retail value of $250.
The mortician named was Jordan Undertaking Company, connected with and having a common management with the insurer.
The policy named as "Beneficiary, Lula Edwards daughter."
The policy stipulated:
The policy further stipulated for embalming the body, transportation of a limited number to attend a local interment, or transportation of the body to a distant point.
The complaint alleges the mortician failed and refused to furnish a funeral of the retail value stipulated, denied to the beneficiary the privilege of selecting the casket as per contract, and instead used a cheap inexpensive casket of the mortician's own selection.
The action was brought by Lula Edwards, as administratrix of the estate of Carrie Washington, the insured. The policy was made part of the complaint. Demurrer raised the point that the suit must be brought by Lula Edwards, individually, as the beneficiary named in the policy, not by the personal representative of the insured.
The trial court overruled the demurrer. This ruling is here presented for review.
The nature and purpose of such insurance is the controlling inquiry.
It is not the purpose to create an estate for administration, the payment of debts, and distribution among next of kin. The end and aim is to provide for a proper burial and funeral when the occasion arrives.
This type of insurance is primarily for the poor. By a small weekly sum a fund is built up in the hands of the insurer. In this case the mortician to furnish the funeral is named; one identified with and having a common interest with the insurer.
To all intents and purposes we may say the insurer undertook here to furnish the funeral through its mortician of the value stipulated.
Naming the daughter, as beneficiary, had a distinct purpose disclosed in the policy. She was thus appointed by the insured as the one to fix the time and place of the funeral and interment, the one who should select the casket. She was the one to see that the contract was carried out. When she selected the casket, it was not for the administratrix to object. The contractual obligations, in our opinion, ran to her, as beneficiary.
It is...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Mutual Sav. Life Ins. Co. v. Noah
...insured in such a policy who is in reality the recipient of the insurance benefits, not the named beneficiary. Jordan's Mutual Aid Association v. Edwards, 232 Ala. 80, 166 So. 780. But, even if it could be said that the burial policy is subject to the insurable interest requirement, this co......
-
Liberty Nat. Life Ins. Co. v. Stringfellow
...benefit, but avers that the vault was to be furnished for the burial of the insured. As stated by Bouldin, J., in Jordan's Mut. Aid Ass'n. v. Edwards, 232 Ala. 80, 166 So. 780, such policy imposes a 'moral burden' on the beneficiary to see to the execution of the contract. Actually there is......
-
Estate of Ryan v. Great-West Life Assur. Co.
...insurance policy is the wife where she is beneficiary, not the wife as administratrix of insured's estate. Jordan's Mutual Aid Ass'n. v. Edwards (1936), 232 Ala. 80, 166 So. 780; Cannon v. Katz Drug Co. (1978), Mo.App., 577 S.W.2d ...
- Spencer v. Bley Bros.