Jordan v. Los Angeles County

Decision Date23 February 1984
Docket NumberNo. 79-3112,79-3112
Citation726 F.2d 1366
Parties36 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 1592 Charles L. JORDAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant-Appellee.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit

(Opinion, Aug. 18, 1983, 11 Cir.1983, 713 F.2d 503)

Before TANG, SCHROEDER and NELSON, Circuit Judges.

The Order Amending Opinion filed January 19, 1984, * is withdrawn.

The opinion filed August 18, 1983, is amended as follows:

After the fourth paragraph of the opinion, the following paragraph shall be inserted:

Falcon does not prohibit "across the board" class formation in every instance. See [General Telephone Co. v.] Falcon , 102 S.Ct. [2364] at 2371 n. 15 (Across the board actions aimed at a specific hiring practice are permissible under Rule 23). However, even though it would be permissible to form a class of all black applicants challenging a specified hiring practice, we must conclude after recomputation of the actual number of rejected black applicants, that such a class in the present case would still fail under the numerosity requirement of Rule 23.

* The only change made by the order of January 19, 1984, was the addition of a new paragraph after the fourth paragraph of the original opinion; the paragraph so added is revised by the second order of amendment.

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Hodgers-Durgin v. de la Vina
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • January 12, 1999
    ...discriminatory policy. See Jordan v. County of Los Angeles, 713 F.2d 503, 504 (9th Cir.) (explaining Falcon ), as amended, 726 F.2d 1366 (9th Cir.1984). Thus, to the extent that the class members in Rochford complained of very different practices, Rochford may not remain good law.In Falcon,......
  • A. B. v. Haw. State Dep't of Educ.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • April 4, 2022
    ...(9th Cir. 1982), vacated , 459 U.S. 810, 103 S.Ct. 35, 74 L.Ed.2d 48 (1982), on remand , 713 F.2d 503 (9th Cir. 1983), modified , 726 F.2d 1366 (9th Cir. 1984). Defendants, however, contend that Jordan is no longer good law and in any event is distinguishable. Because the parties have point......
  • Narouz v. Charter Communications, LLC
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • January 15, 2010
    ...U.S. 810, 103 S.Ct. 35, 74 L.Ed.2d 48 (1982), rev'd on other grounds on remand, 713 F.2d 503 (9th Cir. 1984), amended on remand, 726 F.2d 1366 (9th Cir. 1984), on the footing that in Jordan, unlike Seidman, the parties had not stipulated to a voluntary dismissal of the action. 785 F.2d at 1......
  • Desaracho v. Custom Food
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • March 3, 2000
    ...1311, 1324 (9th Cir.), vacated on other grounds, 459 U.S. 810 (1982), on remand, 713 F.2d 503 (9th Cir. 1983), opinion amended, 726 F.2d 1366 (9th Cir. 1984). Defendants did not raise the authority to sue issue until one week before the trial was scheduled to begin. None of defendants made ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT