Jordan v. FEDERAL FARM MORTGAGE CORPORATION, 13117

Decision Date27 December 1945
Docket Number13194.,No. 13117,13117
PartiesJORDAN v. FEDERAL FARM MORTGAGE CORPORATION et al.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit

R. Brown, of Creston, Iowa (M. L. Donovan, of Omaha, Neb., on the brief), for appellant.

William W. Graham, of Omaha, Neb., for appellees Federal Land Bank of Omaha and another.

Edgar H. Morsman, III, of Omaha, Neb., for appellees Stock Yards National Bank of South Omaha, and another.

R. E. Killmar, of Osceola, Iowa, for appellee Thomas McCann.

George C. Stuart, of Chariton, Iowa, for appellee Union Central Life Insurance Company.

Virgil Meyer, of Chariton, Iowa, for appellee B. J. Bergesen.

Before GARDNER, THOMAS, and RIDDICK, Circuit Judges.

RIDDICK, Circuit Judge.

The debtor, a resident of Nebraska, filed this proceeding for relief under section 75 of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S.C.A. § 203, in the Federal District Court for the Southern District of Iowa. The debtor's petition was dismissed by the District Court on motion of the creditors, on the finding that the debtor was not a farmer within the meaning of the definition contained in section 75, sub. r of the Act and that, for this reason, the court was without jurisdiction of the proceeding. After perfecting his appeal to this court from the order of the District Court dismissing his petition, the debtor filed in the District Court a pleading entitled "Motion for Re-Hearing and Petition for Proceedings under Chapter XII of the Bankruptcy Act 11 U.S.C.A. § 801 et seq.." The District Court dismissed this pleading on the ground that it came too late, and the debtor appealed from this order of dismissal. Both appeals were consolidated for hearing in this court.

In the schedules supporting his petition filed in the Iowa District Court, the debtor claimed to be the owner of a large ranch of more than 10,000 acres located in Cherry County, Neb., and of three farms in Iowa. He listed among his creditors the Stock Yards National Bank of South Omaha, the Federal Land Bank of Omaha, and the First Trust Company of Lincoln, as holders of first and second mortgages on his Nebraska ranch; and the persons from whom he had purchased the Iowa farms, to whom he claimed to be indebted in the aggregate amount of approximately $44,000 on the purchase price of the farms.

The facts are not in dispute. In 1942 the debtor was the owner of a ranch in Cherry County, Neb. In August of that year he filed a petition for relief under section 75 of the Bankruptcy Act in a Federal District Court in Nebraska. That court found that the debtor was not a farmer, and on February 20, 1943, dismissed his petition. In re Jordan, D.C., 48 F.Supp. 889. The order was affirmed on appeal to this court in an opinion handed down December 27, 1943. Jordan v. Federal Land Bank of Omaha, 8 Cir., 139 F.2d 203. Thereafter, in foreclosure proceedings brought in the Nebraska State court, all of the debtor's land in Cherry County, Neb., was sold, the sale confirmed, and a sheriff's deed conveying the land, dated January 3, 1945, was duly approved and placed of record. All of these events occurred before the filing of the present petition, and, with exceptions of no importance here, before the debtor acquired any interest in the farms in Iowa.

In November and December, 1944, and January, 1945, the debtor entered into contracts with the owners for the purchase of the three Iowa farms, in the hope, as he states in his brief, "that he might resell the same, at a profit, in view of the probable increase of land because of the war." He leased these farms to tenants for the crop year 1945. The aggregate purchase price for the three farms was approximately $46,000, of which amount the debtor paid $2,500, and obligated himself to pay over $16,000 by March, 1945. Each of the purchase contracts provided for the forfeiture of all of the debtor's rights to the Iowa farms upon failure to meet any installment of the purchase price. The debtor met none of them. He owned no farm machinery or equipment in Iowa. He never intended to take any part in the operation of the Iowa farms. He never visited the farms except possibly when negotiating for their purchase or lease. From the debtor's statement of his financial condition at the time of the purchase of the Iowa farms, it is clear that he could never have entertained even a remote hope of realizing income from their operation as farms. His petition was filed in the Iowa...

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • Knutson v. Ag Processing, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Iowa
    • February 13, 2004
    ...or supplement the order being appealed") (citing 20 Moore's Federal Practice § 303.32[2][a][ii] & n. 15); Jordan v. Fed. Farm Mortg. Corp., 152 F.2d 642, 644 (8th Cir.1945) ("The general rule is that after appeal from the District Court to the Circuit Court of Appeals has been perfected the......
  • Hamer v. Campbell, 22552.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • April 6, 1966
    ...Facilities Realty Trust, 7 Cir., 1955, 227 F.2d 651; Brasier v. United States, 10 Cir., 1955, 229 F.2d 176; Jordan v. Federal Farm Mortgage Corp., 8 Cir., 1945, 152 F.2d 642. 24 Subsequent to the District Court's denial of the relief requested in this complaint and plaintiffs' appeal of thi......
  • In re Federal Facilities Realty Trust
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Seventh Circuit
    • June 14, 1955
    ...Smith v. Pollin, 90 U.S.App.D.C. 178, 194 F.2d 349; Willoughby v. Sinclair Oil & Gas Co., 10 Cir., 188 F.2d 902; Jordan v. Federal Farm Mortgage Corp., 8 Cir., 152 F.2d 642, certiorari denied 328 U.S. 852, 66 S. Ct. 1339, 90 L.Ed. 1624; J. J. Theatres, Inc., v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Co......
  • Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corp. v. City of Seattle, Wash.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • September 2, 1960
    ...Smith v. Pollin, 90 U.S.App.D.C. 178, 194 F.2d 349; Willoughby v. Sinclair Oil & Gas Co., 10 Cir., 188 F.2d 902; Jordan v. Federal Farm Mortgage Corp., 8 Cir., 152 F.2d 642, * * *; Daniels v. Goldberg, D.C., 8 F.R.D. 580, affirmed 2 Cir., 173 F.2d The question was further discussed in Distr......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT