Jordan v. Gardner, s. 90-35307

Decision Date07 July 1992
Docket Number90-35552,Nos. 90-35307,s. 90-35307
PartiesNina JORDAN; Susan Bagley; Sharon Hanson; Sandra Entz; Yvonne Wood, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Booth GARDNER; Chase Riveland; Lawrence Kincheloe; Eldon Vail; Richard Affresio, Defendants-Appellants, and Washington State Corrections Employees Association, Defendant-Intervenor.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
ORDER

Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, BROWNING, HUG, TANG, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, ALARCON, POOLE, D.W. NELSON, CANBY, NORRIS, REINHARDT, BEEZER, HALL, WIGGINS, BRUNETTI, KOZINSKI, NOONAN, THOMPSON, O'SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, TROTT, FERNANDEZ, RYMER, T.G. NELSON, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case, 953 F.2d 1137, be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Jordan v. Gardner
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • 25 Febrero 1993
    ...Amendment rights. We vacate our earlier three-judge panel decision, Jordan v. Gardner, 953 F.2d 1137, reh'g en banc granted, 968 F.2d 984 (9th Cir.1992), which reversed the district court. Sitting en banc, we now affirm the district court on Eighth grounds and do not reach the inmates' othe......
  • United States v. Pearson, Case No. CR 17-00051-BRO
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Central District of California
    • 28 Abril 2017
  • U.S. v. Heredia-Quiroz
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • 27 Abril 1993

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT