Jordan v. State

Decision Date26 October 1990
Citation574 So.2d 1024
PartiesCalvin JORDAN v. STATE. CR 89-822.
CourtAlabama Court of Criminal Appeals

Robert H. Turner, Marion, for appellant.

Don Siegelman, Atty. Gen., and Yvonne A. Henderson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

JAMES H. FAULKNER, Retired Justice.

Calvin Jordan was indicted for the unlawful distribution of a controlled substance in violation of § 13A-12-211, Code of Alabama 1975. Jordan pleaded guilty to the charge in the indictment and was sentenced to 15 years in the penitentiary. Two issues are raised on appeal.

Initially, Jordan contends that the trial court committed reversible error in the sentencing phase by basing Jordan's sentence upon Jordan's alleged sale of controlled substances in a prior case in which there was no conviction. Secondly, Jordan contends that the indictment returned against him was returned by an unlawfully constituted grand jury and is therefore void.

It is axiomatic that to preserve an assignment of error for appellate review, the alleged error must first be presented to the trial court. Dossey v. State, 489 So.2d 662 (Ala.Cr.App.), cert. denied, 489 So.2d 662 (Ala.1986). In the present case, Jordan did not object to his sentence at the sentencing hearing, nor did he file a motion for reconsideration based upon the court's consideration of allegedly improper facts at the sentencing hearing. Jordan, moreover, never raised the issue of the allegedly void indictment at any time during the proceedings below. Consequently, because these issues were not raised below, they have not been preserved for review at this time.

The foregoing opinion was prepared by the Honorable JAMES H. FAULKNER, a retired Supreme Court Justice, and his opinion is hereby adopted as that of the court.

The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

All the Judges concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
15 cases
  • Miller v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • August 27, 2010
    ...(defendant must first obtain an adverse ruling in order to preserve an issue for appellate review); Jordan v. State, 574 So.2d 1024, 1025 (Ala.Crim.App.1990) (claim was not preserved for appellate review where defendant did not first present his argument to the trial court). Therefore, thes......
  • Miller V. State Of Ala. Appeal From Lawrence Circuit Court (CC-06-68)
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • June 25, 2010
    ...App. 1989)(defendant must first obtain an adverse ruling in order to preserve an issue for appellate review); Jordan v. State, 574 So. 2d 1024, 1025 (Ala. Crim. App. 1990)(claim was not preserved for appellate review where defendant did not first present his argument tothe trial court). The......
  • Nichols v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • May 7, 1993
    ...enhancement statute (§ 13A-12-250) was unconstitutional, that issue was not preserved for appellate review); Jordan v. State, 574 So.2d 1024, 1025 (Ala.Cr.App.1990) (where defendant failed to "object to his sentence at the sentence hearing" and did not "file a motion for reconsideration bas......
  • T.D.F. v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • March 16, 2018
    ...it has not been properly preserved and presented." Pate v. State, 601 So.2d 210, 213 (Ala. Crim. App. 1992) ; Jordan v. State, 574 So.2d 1024, 1025 (Ala. Crim. App. 1990) (holding that claim was not preserved for appellate review where defendant did not first present his argument to the tri......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT