Joseph Battin, Patentee and Samuel Battin, Assignee Plaintiffs In Error v. James Taggert, Defendant In Error Joseph Battin, Patentee and Samuel Battin, Assignee Plaintiffs In Error v. Robert Radcliffe and John Johnson, Defendants In Error Joseph Battin, Patentee and Samuel Battin, Assignee Plaintiffs In Error v. John Hewes, Defendant In Error
Decision Date | 01 December 1854 |
Citation | 58 U.S. 74,15 L.Ed. 37,17 How. 74 |
Parties | JOSEPH BATTIN, PATENTEE, AND SAMUEL BATTIN, ASSIGNEE, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. JAMES TAGGERT, DEFENDANT IN ERROR. JOSEPH BATTIN, PATENTEE, AND SAMUEL BATTIN, ASSIGNEE, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. ROBERT RADCLIFFE AND JOHN JOHNSON, DEFENDANTS IN ERROR. JOSEPH BATTIN, PATENTEE, AND SAMUEL BATTIN, ASSIGNEE, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. JOHN G. HEWES, DEFENDANT IN ERROR |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
To continue reading
Request your trial39 cases
-
Williams Mfg Co v. United Shoe Machinery Corporation
...thereof * * * may * * * obtain a patent therefor.' R.S. 4886, as amended, 35 U.S.C. § 31, 35 U.S.C.A. § 31. 4 Battin v. Taggert, 17 How. 74, 85, 15 L.Ed. 37; Bischoff v. Wethered, 9 Wall. 812, 814, 19 L.Ed. 829; Thomson Spot Welder Co. v. Ford Motor Co., 265 U.S. 445, 446, 44 S.Ct. 533, 534......
-
Newell Companies, Inc. v. Kenney Mfg. Co.
...quite apparent that there was no error in the submission of the questions presented at the trial to the jury.... Battin v. Taggert, 58 U.S. (17 How.) 74, 85, 15 L.Ed. 37 (1854): The jury are also to judge of the novelty of the invention.... Turrill v. Railroad Co., 68 U.S. (1 Wall.) 491, 51......
-
Lockwood, In re
...at law; in such a case, the defense of invalidity was tried to the jury, assuming that a jury had been demanded. Battin v. Taggart, 58 U.S. (17 How.) 74, 85, 15 L.Ed. 37 (1854); Wood v. Underhill, 46 U.S. (5 How.) 1, 5-6, 12 L.Ed. 23 (1847). However, if the patentee facing past acts of infr......
-
Marine Polymer Techs., Inc. v. Hemcon, Inc.
...yet an amendment may give to it validity, and protect the rights of the patentee against all subsequent infringements.58 U.S. 74, 83, 17 How. 74, 15 L.Ed. 37 (1854) (emphasis added). Similarly, in a case where a patentee had amended the specification during reissue by, inter alia, inserting......
Request a trial to view additional results