Joyner v. Jefferson Standard Life Ins. Co., 6319.

Decision Date01 December 1931
Docket NumberNo. 6319.,6319.
Citation53 F.2d 745
PartiesJOYNER v. JEFFERSON STANDARD LIFE INS. CO.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit

S. F. Memory, of Blackshear, Ga., Larry E. Pedrick and Leon A. Wilson, both of Waycross, Ga., for appellant.

Grover Middlebrooks, of Atlanta, Ga., for appellee.

Before BRYAN, FOSTER, and WALKER, Circuit Judges.

BRYAN, Circuit Judge.

This is an action on a life insurance policy, which was dismissed on demurrer on the ground that the policy had lapsed for the nonpayment of premium. The policy was issued March 5, 1922. The annual premium was $277, though the insured had the right to pay it in quarterly installments of $73.40; but the payment of any installment did not continue the policy in force beyond the due date of the next installment. The premiums were paid for seven years. The last payment was of a quarterly installment due on March 5, 1929. The insured died on August 26, of that year. The policy contained provisions to the following effect: The insured had the right to borrow on the sole security of the policy at 6 per cent. per annum the cash value available at the end of the then current year, the amount of the loan to be deducted from the cash surrender value. He also had the right within sixty days from the date of nonpayment of any premium after the third to receive the guaranteed value in cash, less any indebtedness, in paid-up insurance, or in extended insurance. At the end of the first year and annually thereafter the policy while in force was entitled to share in dividends apportioned from the surplus which the insured at his option was entitled to receive in cash, but only upon the payment of the next succeeding premium. If the insured did not elect within sixty days from date of default in the payment of any premium to accept one of the guaranteed values, in cash, paid-up insurance, or extended insurance, the company would charge the unpaid premium as a loan against the cash value available at the end of the policy year for which premiums had been fully paid and continue the policy in force the same as if the premiums had been paid, provided the cash value less existing indebtedness with accrued interest was sufficient to pay a full annual premium or an installment. If the cash value available were less than sufficient to pay a quarterly installment, it was to be used to extend the life of the policy for that portion of a year that it might bear to the full annual premium. In the payment of any premium except the first, a grace period of one month was allowed, subject to...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Fawcett v. Security Ben. Ass'n
    • United States
    • Utah Supreme Court
    • July 2, 1940
    ... ... and continues Whole Life Protection for ten years and thirty ... days ... Kimball v. New York Life Ins. Co. , 96 Vt ... 19, 116 A. 119; Dunn v ... Society , 4 Cir., 58 F.2d 15; Joyner v ... Jefferson Standard Life Insurance Co. , ... ...
  • Chilimidos v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., Civ. A. No. 8618.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Massachusetts
    • August 11, 1950
    ...rather than from the date of expiration of the grace period. Bankers' Life Co. v. Burns, 5 Cir., 30 F.2d 327; Joyner v. Jefferson Standard Life Insurance Co., 5 Cir., 53 F.2d 745; Lipman v. Equitable Life Assurance Society, 4 Cir., 58 F.2d 15; Ratliff v. Kentucky Home Mut. Life Ins. Co., 5 ......
  • De Long v. Jefferson Standard Life Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • March 15, 1940
    ...nonparticipating insurance. Omaha National Bank v. Mutual Benefit Life Insurance Co., 3 Cir., 84 F. 122; Joyner v. Jefferson Standard Life Insurance Co., 5 Cir., 53 F.2d 745. Insured did not make an election, but died within the sixty-day election period, and the law immediately selected th......
  • Coons v. Home Life Ins. Co. of New York
    • United States
    • Illinois Supreme Court
    • February 16, 1938
    ...of the cases facts of minor importance were somewhat different, but the principles applied were the same. In Joyner v. Jefferson Standard Life Ins. Co., 5 Cir., 53 F.2d 745, certiorari denied 286 U.S. 542, 52 S.Ct. 498, 76 L.Ed. 1279, the policy provisions were similar to those in this case......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT