JR SIMPLOT COMPANY v. Commissioner
Decision Date | 10 May 1967 |
Docket Number | Docket No. 5603-64. |
Citation | 26 TCM (CCH) 488,1967 TC Memo 104 |
Parties | J. R. Simplot Company v. Commissioner. |
Court | U.S. Tax Court |
L. E. Haight, J. R. Simplot Co., Boise, Idaho, for the petitioner. John C. Picco, for the respondent.
Respondent determined deficiencies in petitioner's Federal income taxes for the fiscal years ending on February 28, 1958 and 1959, and February 29, 1960, in the amounts of $27,725.94, $4,294.14, and $5,460.00, respectively.
Petitioner has not raised an objection to respondent's determinations for the fiscal years ended February 28, 1959, and February 29, 1960, and has conceded part of the deficiency determined for the fiscal year ended February 28, 1958. The sole issue remaining for determination is whether the loss sustained in the fiscal year ended February 28, 1958, by petitioner in the amount of $19,841.61 from the disposition of certain timber-cutting contracts is properly a capital loss as determined by respondent or an ordinary loss as claimed by petitioner.
All of the facts have been stipulated, and the stipulation of facts, together with the exhibits attached thereto, is incorporated herein by this reference.
Petitioner, J. R. Simplot Company, an accrual basis taxpayer, is a Nevada corporation having a place of business at 200 Simplot Building, Boise, Idaho, and is qualified to conduct business in the State of Idaho. It filed a timely Federal income tax return for the fiscal year ended February 28, 1958, with the district director of internal revenue for the district of Idaho.
Among other things, petitioner is engaged in the sawmill business in Idaho and California, manufacturing lumber. It operates a sawmill located near Horseshoe Bend, Idaho.
On October 3, 1955, petitioner, doing business as the Caldwell Lumber Company, entered into a timber-cutting contract with the United States Forest Service (hereinafter referred to as the Clear Creek contract). Two additional contracts were entered into with the Bureau of Land Management and the United States Forest Service on April 16, 1956, and November 26, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the Cascade Public Domain and the Smith Creek contracts, respectively). The three timber-cutting contracts, entered into in the normal course of petitioner's lumber manufacturing business, provided for the cutting and purchase of a certain quantity of timber prior to a certain date set forth therein and at specified stumpage rates.1
The Clear Creek contract provided in pertinent part as follows:
Section 5a. Period of Contract.
Section 12g. Performance by Other than Purchaser.
Section 13b. Settlement.
1. The purchaser agrees that any money advanced or deposited under this contract may, upon failure on his part to fulfill all and singular the requirements set forth in this contract or made a part hereof, be retained by the Forest Service to be applied toward the satisfaction of his obligations assumed under this contract without prejudice to any other rights and remedies of the Forest Service.
The termination dates of all three contracts were duly extended, by the respective Federal agencies involved, for cutting in 1957 and subsequent years. Petitioner began cutting operations pursuant to the contracts, but in 1957, due to a lack of timber in the vicinity of the Horseshoe Bend sawmill and because of the adverse conditions of the lumber market, it commenced the liquidation of its logging equipment and cut down its production at the sawmill.
In the fiscal year ended February 28, 1958, petitioner's Horseshoe Bend sawmill was sold and no further lumber manufacturing was done by petitioner in Idaho. Since timber remained to be cut pursuant to the three contracts, petitioner sought to negotiate a cancellation of the contracts with the United States Forest Service and the Bureau of Land Management.
The Federal agencies involved would not consider a cancellation of the contracts nor would they consider an "across the board" transfer of the contracts to a third party, stating that section 12g of the contracts prevented the petitioner from relieving itself of its responsibilities or liabilities by a sale or transfer of the contracts. Upon the failure of these negotiations petitioner decided to find a responsible person who would assume the uncompleted contracts.
On April 13, 1958, petitioner entered into an agreement with one Lawrence Hettinger, doing business as Producers Lumber Company, of Boise. The agreement was in the form of a letter dated April 3, 1958, written by petitioner and later agreed to and signed by Hettinger (d/b/a Producers Lumber Company). The agreement provided that:
Pursuant to this last quoted provision, petitioner did in fact conduct regular inspections of the work to assure itself that the basic contracts were being performed.
On April 9, 1958, an "Application for Recognition and Approval of Third Party Agreement" was made to the Federal agencies. Proper approval of the application was given upon the condition that said approval would not operate to release petitioner from any of its obligations under the timber-cutting contracts.
On its Federal income tax return for the fiscal year ended February 28, 1958, petitioner claimed as an ordinary business deduction the sum of $19,841.61, described therein as losses from "Other abandonments."2
Respondent in his statutory notice of deficiency determined that the losses described as "Other abandonments" were sustained in...
To continue reading
Request your trial