JS v. Beaird, No. SC 82274.

CourtMissouri Supreme Court
Writing for the CourtJames R. Wyrsch, Marilyn B. Keller, Christen D. Shepherd, Kansas City, for appellant
Citation28 S.W.3d 875
PartiesJ.S., Appellant, v. Robert BEAIRD, et al., Respondents.
Docket NumberNo. SC 82274.
Decision Date17 October 2000

28 S.W.3d 875

J.S., Appellant,
v.
Robert BEAIRD, et al., Respondents.

No. SC 82274.

Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc.

October 17, 2000.


James R. Wyrsch, Marilyn B. Keller, Christen D. Shepherd, Kansas City, for appellant.

Lisa N. Gentleman, Deputy County Counselor, Kansas City, for respondents Beaird and Anderson.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, Virginia Wasiuk Lay, Asst. Atty. Gen., Kansas city, for intervenor State of Mo.

JOHN C. HOLSTEIN, Judge.

J.S. was convicted of statutory rape in 1983. He served a prison sentence until 1987 and was discharged from parole in 1993. Since his discharge he has resided in Jackson County, Missouri, and has worked as an over-the-road truck driver. In 1994, the state enacted "Megan's Law," sec. 589.400 to 589.425., RSMo Supp.1999. The statute requires registration by certain sex offenders with the local sheriff's department. In 1999, the Jackson County sheriff notified J.S. that he must register. J.S. filed suit for an injunction and declaratory judgment in the circuit court claiming he is not among those who must register as a sex offender under the statute. He also asserts the statute is an unconstitutional

28 S.W.3d 876
ex post facto law as applied to him. The trial court entered judgment in favor of the Jackson County prosecutor and sheriff. Because J.S.'s petition challenges the validity of a statute of this state, this Court has jurisdiction of the appeal. Mo. Const. art. V, sec. 3. Because the law is not applicable to J.S., the judgment is reversed. The Court does not reach the constitutional issue

Missouri's sex offender registration statute, sec. 589.400, was originally passed in 1994 with an effective date of January 1, 1995. It was amended slightly in 1997. It contains two relevant sections:

1. Sections 589.400 to 589.425 shall apply to:

Any person who, since July 1, 1979, has been or is hereafter convicted of, been found guilty of, or pled guilty to committing, or attempting to commit, a felony offense of chapter 566,....

2. Any person to whom sections 589.400 to 589.425 applies shall, within ten days of coming into any county, register with the chief law enforcement official of the county in which such person resides.

The first subsection enumerates those to whom the statute applies. J.S. does not dispute that he falls under subsection 1 as he was found guilty of a felony sex offense under chapter 566 after July 1, 1979. The critical question is whether J.S. falls...

To continue reading

Request your trial
23 practice notes
  • R.W. v. Sanders, No. SC 85652.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Missouri
    • January 11, 2005
    ...intent for enacting section 589.400 was to protect children from violence at the hands of sex offenders." J.S. v. Beaird, 28 S.W.3d 875, 876 (Mo.2000). When a statute is "an incident of the State's power to protect the health and safety of its citizens," it will be considered......
  • Doe v. Phillips, No. SC 86573.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Missouri
    • June 30, 2006
    ...Law, and of similar acts in other states, is to "protect children from violence at the hands of sex offenders," J.S. v. Beaird, 28 S.W.3d 875, 876 (Mo. banc 2000), and to respond to the known danger of recidivism among sex offenders. Connecticut Dept. of Pub. Safety v. Doe, 538 U.......
  • United Pharmacal Co. v. Mo Bd. of Pharmacy, No. SC 87316.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Missouri
    • December 19, 2006
    ...711, 712-713 (Mo banc.2005). The rule, however, is applicable where violation of a civil statute has penal consequences. J.S. v. Beaird, 28 S.W.3d 875, 877 (Mo. banc 2000); See also, City of Kansas City v. Tyson, 169 S.W.3d 927 (Mo.App.2005). Section 338.195 provides that failing to comply ......
  • State v. Jones, No. WD 63842.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Missouri
    • October 4, 2005
    ...legislative intent" to be protection of "children from violence at the hands of sex offenders." J.S. v. Beaird, 28 S.W.3d 875, 876 (Mo. banc 2000) (emphasis added). In light of the legislature's use of common terms in a malum in se statute, we err in resorting to the rule of ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
23 cases
  • R.W. v. Sanders, No. SC 85652.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Missouri
    • January 11, 2005
    ...legislative intent for enacting section 589.400 was to protect children from violence at the hands of sex offenders." J.S. v. Beaird, 28 S.W.3d 875, 876 (Mo.2000). When a statute is "an incident of the State's power to protect the health and safety of its citizens," it will be considered "a......
  • Doe v. Phillips, No. SC 86573.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Missouri
    • June 30, 2006
    ...Megan's Law, and of similar acts in other states, is to "protect children from violence at the hands of sex offenders," J.S. v. Beaird, 28 S.W.3d 875, 876 (Mo. banc 2000), and to respond to the known danger of recidivism among sex offenders. Connecticut Dept. of Pub. Safety v. Doe, 538 U.S.......
  • United Pharmacal Co. v. Mo Bd. of Pharmacy, No. SC 87316.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Missouri
    • December 19, 2006
    ...711, 712-713 (Mo banc.2005). The rule, however, is applicable where violation of a civil statute has penal consequences. J.S. v. Beaird, 28 S.W.3d 875, 877 (Mo. banc 2000); See also, City of Kansas City v. Tyson, 169 S.W.3d 927 (Mo.App.2005). Section 338.195 provides that failing to comply ......
  • State v. Jones, No. WD 63842.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Missouri
    • October 4, 2005
    ...it declared the "obvious legislative intent" to be protection of "children from violence at the hands of sex offenders." J.S. v. Beaird, 28 S.W.3d 875, 876 (Mo. banc 2000) (emphasis added). In light of the legislature's use of common terms in a malum in se statute, we err in resorting to th......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT