Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Lamone
Decision Date | 17 April 2020 |
Docket Number | Civil Action No. ELH-17-2006 |
Citation | 455 F.Supp.3d 209 |
Parties | JUDICIAL WATCH, INC., Plaintiff, v. Linda LAMONE, et al., Defendants. |
Court | U.S. District Court — District of Maryland |
Eric William Payne Lee, Ramona R. Cotca, Robert D. Popper, Judicial Watch, Inc., Washington, DC, H. Christopher Coates, Pro Hac Vice, Law Offices of H. Christopher Coates, Charleston, SC, for Plaintiff.
Robert A. Scott, Andrea William Trento, Office of the Attorney General, Baltimore, MD, for Defendants.
Plaintiff Judicial Watch, Inc. ("Judicial Watch"), a "not-for-profit, educational organization" (ECF 1, ¶ 5), sued a host of Maryland officials to compel compliance with Section 8(i) of the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 ("NVRA" or the "Act"), codified, as amended, at 52 U.S.C. § 20507(i). See ECF 1 ("Complaint"). In particular, Judicial Watch seeks access to voter registration lists for Montgomery County, Maryland, to include voter dates of birth.
Defendants include Linda Lamone, the Maryland Administrator of Elections; David McManus, Jr., then the Chairman of the Maryland State Board of Elections ("SBE"); Patrick Hogan, the Vice-Chairman of the SBE; Jared DeMarinis, the Public Information Act Officer and Director of the Division of Candidacy and Campaign Finance for SBE; and SBE Members Michael Cogan, Kelley Howells, and Gloria Lawlah. Id.1 They were sued only in their official capacities, pursuant to 52 U.S.C. § 20510(b). I shall sometimes refer to the defendants collectively as the "State."
The parties filed cross motions for summary judgment. ECF 43 (the "Plaintiff's Motion"); ECF 49 (the "Defendants’ Motion"). The motions, which were amply briefed, were supported by numerous exhibits. By Memorandum Opinion (ECF 54) and Order (ECF 55) of August 8, 2019, I determined that Judicial Watch is entitled to the "voter list for Montgomery County that includes fields indicating names, home address, most recent voter activity, and active or inactive status." ECF 55 at 1; see also ECF 59, Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Lamone , 399 F. Supp. 3d 425 (D. Md. 2019).2 However, I did not resolve the issue of whether the State was required to disclose the voters’ dates of birth. ECF 59 at 31. Instead, I asked the parties to brief the issue "more fully," to include consideration of the Fourth Circuit's decision in Project Vote/Voting for America, Inc. v. Long , 682 F.3d 331 (4th Cir. 2012). Id.
Defendants’ supplemental submission is docketed at ECF 60, and is supported by two exhibits. ECF 60-1 to ECF 60-2. Plaintiff's supplement is at ECF 61, and is supported by three exhibits. ECF 61-1 to ECF 61-3. Both sides also replied. ECF 62 (defendants); ECF 63 (plaintiff). And, plaintiff submitted an additional exhibit. ECF 63-1.
No hearing is necessary to resolve the remaining issue. See Local Rules 105.6. For the reasons that follow, I shall require the State to disclose the voter birth dates.
Under Maryland law, the SBE "shall manage and supervise elections in the State and ensure compliance with the requirements of [State law] and any applicable federal law...." Md. Code § 2-102(a) of the Election Law Article ("E.L."). Among other things, the SBE shall "adopt regulations to implement its powers and duties"; appoint a State Administrator; and "prescribe all forms required under this article." E.L. §§ 2-102(b)(4), (b)(6), (b)(11). Lamone, as Administrator of the SBE, is the "Chief State election official ... responsible for coordination of State responsibilities" under the NVRA. 52 U.S.C. § 20509 ; E.L. § 2-103(b)(8).
Maryland maintains a statewide database, known as MDVOTERS, containing voter registration records. ECF 49-8 (Declaration of Mary Cramer Wagner), ¶4; see also ECF 43-3 (Deposition of Mary Cramer Wagner) at 6, Tr. 26-27; ECF 43-4 (Deposition of Janet Smith) at 13, Tr. 71; ECF 59 at 6. Notably, a voter's registration form requires his or her full birthdate, but only the last four digits of a social security number.4
The voter data compiled by the State includes the voter's personal information, as well as information concerning the voter's registration status. ECF 49-8, ¶ 7. The information about voters is organized into "coded fields" or categories of information. Id. The fields include name, date of birth, and address. See ECF 43-4 at 13, Tr. 71. Notably, Maryland maintains these records "dating back to 2005...." ECF 49-8, ¶ 9.
E.L. § 3-506(a)(2) states, in part: "In consultation with the local boards, the State Board shall adopt regulations that specify ... the information to be included on a [voter] list." E.L. § 3-506(a)(2)(iv). Pursuant to Code of Maryland Regulations ("COMAR") 33.03.02.03B, an "application" for a voter registration list "shall be made in writing, in the form required by the State Administrator." COMAR 33.03.02.03(C) states, in part, that the (Emphasis added). The SBE utilizes a standardized form for third parties to request voter registration lists (the "Application"). ECF 49-7; ECF 49-1 at 38; see also ECF 59 at 24.5
According to the State, since August 2017 the Administrator no longer includes date of birth as an available field on the Application. ECF 60 at 2-3; see also ECF 49-7; ECF 53-1. In a Declaration provided by Lamone (ECF 53-1), she explains that, because of complaints from Maryland voters concerned about disclosure of "sensitive information," in July 2017 she directed her staff to remove date of birth as a field on the Application. Id. ¶ 3. The revised Application form went into effect on August 9, 2017. Id. ¶ 4. Thus, the State asserts that since then, birth date information has not been produced in response to an Application. ECF 60 at 13.
On April 11, 2017, i.e. , before the change in the Application, Thomas Fitton, President of Judicial Watch, sent an email to Lamone, as well as the officers and members of both the SBE and the Montgomery County Board of Elections. ECF 1, ¶ 11. The email included a letter to McManus dated April 11, 2017, on which Hogan, Cogan, Howells, Lawlah, Lamone, Shalleck, Khozeimeh, Keefe, Vincent, Naimon, Popper, and Nikki Charlson, the Deputy State Administrator of the SBE, were copied. ECF 1-1 ("Notice Letter").6
The Notice Letter stated, in part, ECF 1-1 at 1-7 (emphasis added):
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Fusaro v. Howard
...a statewide database known as MDVoters. See ECF 53-6 (DeMarinis Deposition) at 4, Tr. 16-17; Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Lamone , ELH-17-2006, 455 F. Supp. 3d 209, 211–12, (D. Md. Apr. 17, 2020). It includes a voter's name, address, party affiliation, and voting history. ECF 53-6 at 4, Tr. 17.2......
-
Ill. Conservative Union v. Illinois
...note that they need not substantiate their request to have standing to pursue their claim. See Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Lamone ("Lamone II"), 455 F. Supp. 3d 209, 225 (D. Md. 2020) ("Judicial Watch need not demonstrate its need for birth dateinformation in order to facilitate its effort to e......
- Horton v. Right Turn Supply, LLC