Judson v. Knights of the Maccabees of the World

CourtU.S. District Court — Western District of New York
CitationJudson v. Knights of the Maccabees of the World, 220 F. 1004 (W.D. N.Y. 1914)
Decision Date13 November 1914
PartiesJUDSON v. KNIGHTS OF THE MACCABEES OF THE WORLD.

Judson Holley & Caton, of Lockport, N.Y., for plaintiff.

Love &amp Keating, of Buffalo, N.Y., for defendant.

HAZEL District Judge.

I have examined the cases relating to the different reasons for remanding causes to the state court, and I am satisfied that in this case the defendant had the right of removal. The application was seasonably made, and within the time prescribed by the statutes of the United States. The defendant entered a voluntary appearance; that is, the attorneys for the defendant filed a notice of appearance, and without personal service of summons voluntarily appeared and admitted service. Such appearance was doubtless a waiver of a right to object to the jurisdiction of the person of the defendant, but was not a waiver of the right of removal to this court.

The more important questions argued at the bar are whether the amount in controversy exceeds the sum of $3,000, and whether in view of the Insurance Law of this state in force since 1910, there is vested in plaintiff a legal right to have this action determined in the Supreme Court of this state. I agree with Judge Pooley, who considered the question on motion for removal under section 29 of the Judicial Code (Act March 3 1911, c. 231, 36 Stat. 1095 (Comp. St. 1913, Sec. 1011)) that the right to be protected in this case arises out of the policy of insurance and the amount which the defendant obligated itself to pay on the death of the plaintiff, namely, $5,000. This was the value of the object to be gained in bringing suit, and not...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
6 cases
  • Jensen v. New York Life Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • May 9, 1931
    ...Ass'n v. Kittles, 2 F.(2d) 211, and by the district court for the Western district of New York in the case of Judson v. Knights of the Maccabees of the World, 220 F. 1004. In the case at bar, the policy contained a two-year incontestable clause, and the minimum face liability of the policy ......
  • McMillen v. Indemnity Ins. Co. of North America
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Missouri
    • May 4, 1925
    ...remove. Stevens v. Richardson (C. C.) 9 F. 191; Conner v. Coal Co. (C. C.) 45 F. 802; Donahue v. Clay Co. (C. C.) 94 F. 23; Judson v. Maccabees (D. C.) 220 F. 1004. As an instance, a defendant may appear for the hearing on a preliminary motion for an injunction without sacrificing his right......
  • New York Life Ins. Co. v. Swift, 5549.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • February 10, 1930
    ...by the United States District Court of the District of Nebraska, Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Rose (D. C.) 294 F. 122, and Judson v. Knights of the Maccabees (D. C.) 220 F. 1004, cases of equal authority, and New York Life Ins. Co. v. McCarthy, 22 F.(2d) 241, decided by this court. The point was......
  • Samuel S. Glauber, Inc. v. Lehigh Valley R. Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • August 31, 1934
    ...* * * complaint." Mr. Justice Johnston said: "Plaintiffs' first contention is untenable. As was said by Judge Hazel, in Judson v. Knights (D. C.) 220 F. 1004, 1005: `Such appearance was doubtless a waiver of a right to object to the jurisdiction of the person of the defendant, but was not a......
  • Get Started for Free