Juncaj v. C & H Industries

CourtSupreme Court of Michigan
Citation432 Mich. 1219,434 N.W.2d 644
PartiesLjena JUNCAJ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. C & H INDUSTRIES and Allstate Insurance Company, Defendants-Appellees, and Second Injury Fund, Defendant-Appellee. SC 81325. 432 Mich. 1219, 434 N.W.2d 644, 51 Ed. Law Rep. 609
Decision Date24 January 1989

Prior reports: 431 Mich. 632, 433 N.W.2d 787; 161 Mich.App. 724, 411 N.W.2d 839.

ORDER

On order of the Court, the motion for rehearing is considered and, in lieu of granting rehearing, we amend this Court's judgment order to provide that we VACATE the judgment of the Court of Appeals and REMAND this case to the Workers' Compensation Appeal Board for further proceedings regarding the employer's unilateral reduction of benefits subsequent to Gusler v. Fairview Tubular Products, 412 Mich. 270, 315 N.W.2d 388 (1981). On remand, the Workers' Compensation Appeal Board shall determine: 1) whether the unilateral reduction of benefits by the employer was improper, and 2) if so, what, if any, remedy should be provided.

We do not retain jurisdiction.

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Sturak v. Ozomaro, Docket No. 207331.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan (US)
    • 23 Febrero 2000
    ...(After Remand), 431 Mich. 632, 645-646, 433 N.W.2d 787 (1988) (opinion by Griffin, J.), mod on other grounds Juncaj v. C & H Industries, 432 Mich. 1219, 434 N.W.2d 644 (1989), and criminal cases, People v. Sexton, 458 Mich. 43, 60-61, 580 N.W.2d 404 (1998); People v. Young, 410 Mich. 363, 3......
  • Thomas v. McGinnis, Docket No. 201840.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan (US)
    • 19 Abril 2000
    ...391 N.W.2d 331 (1986), after remand 431 Mich. 632, 433 N.W.2d 787 (1988), amended sub nom. Juncaj v. C & H Industries, 432 Mich. 1219, 434 N.W.2d 644 (1989) (holding that the filing of a motion for rehearing or the granting thereof does not postpone or deprive a previous Supreme Court opini......
  • Bennett v. Mackinac Bridge Auth., Docket No. 287628.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan (US)
    • 31 Agosto 2010
    ...787 (1988) (opinion by Griffin, J.); Juncaj v. C & H Indus., 161 Mich.App. 724, 734, 411 N.W.2d 839 (1987), vacated on other grounds 432 Mich. 1219, 434 N.W.2d 644 (1989); see also Texas Instruments Inc. v. Cypress Semiconductor Corp., 90 F.3d 1558, 1568 (C.A.Fed., 1996) (observing that “an......
  • Brown v. Laitner, 80118
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Michigan
    • 10 Febrero 1989
    ...... Similarly, see Juncaj v. C & H Industries and Allstate Ins. Co. and Second Injury Fund, 432 Mich. 644, 434 N.W.2d 644 (1989), amending this Court's judgment to provide for ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT