JW Carter Music Co. v. Bass
Decision Date | 15 June 1927 |
Docket Number | No. 833.,833. |
Citation | 20 F.2d 390 |
Parties | J. W. CARTER MUSIC CO. v. BASS, Collector of Internal Revenue. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Southern District of Texas |
Andrews, Streetman, Logue & Mobley, of Houston, Tex., for plaintiff.
H. M. Holden, U. S. Dist. Atty., and Howell Ward, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Houston, Tex., for defendant.
This is a suit at law, brought under the authority of and in accordance with the statutes of the United States allowing such suit, and the principles of the common law controlling same, against J. W. Bass, collector of internal revenue, to recover from him personally for sums collected by him and paid to him as taxes in excess of amounts actually due by plaintiff.
That such a suit can be maintained, that it is personal, and that it is controlled by the common-law principles of a suit in assumpsit on the money counts, except as modified by statute, is well established by the authorities. Sage v. United States, 250 U. S. 37, 39 S. Ct. 415, 63 L. Ed. 828; Smietanka v. Indiana Steel Co., 257 U. S. 4, 42 S. Ct. 1, 66 L. Ed. 99; International Paper Co. v. Burrill (D. C.) 260 F. 664; New York Life Ins. Co. v. Anderson (C. C. A.) 263 F. 527; Holmes, Federal Taxes (6th Ed.) 1547. Of such suits Holmes, supra, says: In the Anderson Case, supra, it is said:
The case made here is simply this, as established by plaintiff and admitted by defendant: Plaintiff paid defendant, for the year 1920, $4,950.34 more than was due for that year. This payment was made to defendant upon his assertion to plaintiff that that amount was due, and upon his demand for payment, and plaintiff would not have paid it, except for the claim and demand. From this statement it follows, nothing else appearing, that from the standpoint of natural justice and equity defendant has taken and is withholding from plaintiff without right $4,950.34 of plaintiff's money.
Upon what theory, then, does the defendant refuse payment, and does he contest it here? Simply this: That though the defendant recognizes the injustice of the situation, that the United States should keep money which had been wrongfully exacted from plaintiff through him, and has endeavored to assist the taxpayer to obtain a refund, he is prevented from making such refund, and required to defend this suit, by a ruling from Washington that, "while there is no doubt that the opinion works a hardship on the taxpayer," they are of the opinion that plaintiff is not entitled to recover because of the fact that, after plaintiff had, on December 5, 1922, paid the money for which it sues, it did on October 6, 1923, execute an agreement in writing, which agreement they say was executed under the authority of, in accordance with, and has the effect ascribed to it by section 1312 of the act of 1921 (Comp. St. § 6371 4/5gg) and section 1106b of the act of 1926 (44 Stat. 113), as follows:
The agreement is as follows:
The facts under which this payment was made and the agreement executed are that an audit of plaintiff's returns, made in 1921 at a time when plaintiff had paid one installment of the taxes, showed plaintiff to be...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Youngstown Mines Corp. v. Prout
...that 'a payment made with a reservation of the right to bring suit for its recovery is not a voluntary payment.' In J. W. Carter Music Co. v. Bass (S.D.Tex.) 20 F.2d 390, 394, a suit at law was brought in accordance with statutes of the United States allowing such suit, and the principles o......
-
Wilson Cypress Co. v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.
...whether the action is asserted in equity or at law. Moses v. MacFerlan, supra, Atlantic Coast Line v. Florida, supra; Carter Music Co. v. Bass, D.C., 20 F.2d 390, 393; Champ Spring Co. v. United States, 8 Cir., 47 F.2d 1, 3; Hartwell Mills v. Rose, 5 Cir., 61 F.2d 441, 443; First State Bank......
-
Bennett v. Commissioner
...of Discretion As Applied Against The United States In Federal Tax Controversies", 19 Tax L. Rev. 487 (1964). Cf. J.W. Carter Music Co. v. Bass, 20 F.2d 390 (S.D. Tex. 1927). Equitable estoppel must be affirmatively pleaded. Estate of Thomas E. Steere v. Commissioner Dec. 20,282, 22 T.C. 79,......
-
Robert W. v. Commissioner
...States v. Bank of Commerce & Trust Co. 40-1 USTC ¶ 9455, 32 F. Supp. 942, 946 (W.D. Tenn. 1940). Petitioners cite J.W. Carter Music Co. v. Bass, 20 F.2d 390 (S.D. Tex. 1927), in support of their contention that the closing agreement should be set aside. In that case, the District Court gran......