K.H., In Interest of, 45191
| Decision Date | 29 March 1983 |
| Docket Number | No. 45191,45191 |
| Citation | K.H., In Interest of, 652 S.W.2d 166 (Mo. App. 1983) |
| Parties | In the Interest of K.H., a Minor under the age of seventeen years. P.H., Appellant, v. Wilbert LONG, Juvenile Officer of the Juvenile Division of the Twenty-Second Judicial Circuit, Respondent. |
| Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
H. Carl Kuelker, St. Louis, for appellant.
Andy Kotschar, St. Louis, for respondent.
Juvenile proceeding under § 211.031.1(1)(A) and (B), (RSMo. Supp.1982) (effective Aug. 13, 1980). The juvenile court gave custody of an infant to the Missouri Division of Family Services with directions as to the return of custody to the child's mother. Mother appeals. We affirm.
Mother asserts that there was not sufficient evidence to show that the child was in a dangerous environment and not receiving proper care. The statute, however, does not require a finding of a dangerous environment. To assert jurisdiction, the juvenile court must find clear and convincing evidence that the child is in need of care and that this need has arisen because the parent has neglected to provide the care necessary for the child's well-being. Section 211.031.1(1), (RSMo. Supp.1982) (effective Aug. 13, 1980); In re Dimmitt, 560 S.W.2d 368, 371-72 (Mo.App.1977).
Our standard of review is one of deference to the trial court whose judgment will be sustained unless there is no substantial evidence to support it. L. v. Jackson County Juvenile Court, 544 S.W.2d 330, 332 (Mo.App.1976).
Although mother asserts there is insufficient evidence to support the finding, the record is replete with evidence that she was incapable of providing proper care for the child. The record shows that on two occasions mother was treated for depression and was diagnosed as moderately mentally retarded. Subsequently, in June of 1981, mother was hospitalized because she exhibited bizarre and inappropriate behavior. There was also concern she might hurt herself. At that time, she was diagnosed as having a schizo-affective disorder, which combines symptoms of schizophrenia and depression, and moderate mental retardation. Mother was discharged from the hospital against medical advice. Further, she failed to visit the out-patient clinic for follow-up treatment as her psychiatrist instructed. There was also evidence that mother was non-compliant about taking the medication prescribed for her condition. In addition, she admitted "shooting drugs." The psychiatrist testified that such drug abuse would only aggravate her condition.
In August of 1981, mother exhibited unusual behavior and gave inappropriate responses during a clinic interview. The attending doctor concluded mother could not properly...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Section 21 Jurisdictionand
Proof
...or is likely to be, directly harmed; reasonable belief that circumstances might cause harm sustains jurisdiction. See, e.g., In re K.H., 652 S.W.2d 166, 166 (Mo. App. E.D. 1983). “[T]he state need not wait until an unfortunate incident occurs to find a parent poses a risk of harm to his or ......
-
Section 31 Appeals
...one of deference to the trial court whose judgment will be sustained unless there is no substantial evidence to support it.” In re K.H., 652 S.W.2d 166, 167 (Mo. App. E.D. 1983). Rule 73.01(c) applies to this review as it does to suits of an equitable nature. Regard is given to the trial co......
-
Section 30 Parent’sMental
Capacity
...center but unilaterally discontinued the necessary medications and failed to enter therapy as prescribed at discharge) In re K.H., 652 S.W.2d 166, 166 (Mo. App. E.D. 1983) (the child’s environment was dangerous, but the court found the child in need of care because the mother was diagnosed ......