Kaelbel Wholesale, Inc. v. Soderstrom
Decision Date | 21 February 2001 |
Docket Number | No. 4D99-406.,4D99-406. |
Citation | 785 So.2d 539 |
Parties | KAELBEL WHOLESALE, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. Pamela SODERSTROM, Appellee. |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Gilbert E. Theissen of Heinrich Gordon Hargrove Weihe & James, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.
Arnold R. Ginsberg of Ginsberg & Schwartz, Robert J. Bryan, P.A., and Lance R. Stelzer, Miami, for appellee.
We are confronted in this appeal with the question of whether the trial court erred in allowing expert evidence under the standard of Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (App.D.C.1923). Appellant contends that the evidence did not meet the Frye test requirement that it be generally accepted in the relevant scientific community. Particularly, the experts' testimony linked appellee's ciguatera poisoning, which she contracted from fish supplied to a restaurant by appellant, to her development of Guillain-Barré Syndrome ("GBS"), a neurological disorder. We conclude that the testimony did not meet the Frye test and reverse the final judgment.
Appellee, Pam Soderstrom, had dinner at a restaurant in Fort Lauderdale, consuming snapper for her main course. Shortly after dinner, she noticed a tingling sensation in her left hand. She continued her evening activities and then went to bed. During the night, her sleep was interrupted by an upset stomach and some mild diarrhea. The next day the "pins and needles" sensation continued, now in both hands, but the intestinal problems subsided. By late the next day, with the symptom still persisting, she became alarmed, as the tingling was in both arms and both legs. She visited a hospital emergency room, where a doctor suspected that she had suffered ciguatera poisoning, based upon her symptoms and her history of consuming fish two days before. Appellant's brief explains:1
In appellee's case, her symptoms were mild, and the doctor did not admit her to the hospital. The next day she saw another doctor, who prescribed an IV infusion of Mannitol, which usually is effective in reducing the symptoms of ciguatera. However, the drug had no effect on appellee's symptoms, and in fact they began to worsen, experiencing weakness in both of her legs. As the symptoms increased, even after a second Mannitol treatment, she realized that she was losing all strength and needed hospitalization. By the time she was admitted, she was paralyzed from the waist down. At that point, the doctors diagnosed her as suffering from GBS.
As appellant observes in its brief:
After appellee made some level of recovery, she filed suit against appellant alleging that it had supplied the fish to the restaurant, that the fish was defective, having contained the ciguatera toxin, and that the ciguatera toxin had caused the GBS. Prior to trial, appellant moved to exclude appellee's expert testimony as to the causal link between ciguatera and GBS, alleging that this was a novel theory and not generally accepted within the relevant scientific community, thus inadmissible under Frye. Although the motion was initially denied, appellant renewed it prior to trial. Rather than interrupt the trial with a series of Frye hearings, the court decided to listen to the expert evidence as it was presented to the jury and make its ruling at the close of the evidence. Ultimately, the court reserved ruling and submitted all issues to the jury. The jury returned a verdict in appellee's favor, and, post-trial, the court denied the motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, prompting this appeal in which appellant claims that appellee's experts' testimony did not meet the Frye test.
Appellee presented two experts, the first of whom was Dr. Robert Lange, an internist specializing in the field of epidemiology, which is the study of diseases in populations rather than individuals. He considered himself an expert on ciguatera but not on GBS, with which he had no clinical experience. While he conceded that ciguatera has never been associated with GBS in any medical or scientific literature, Dr. Lange still opined that ciguatera poisoning caused appellee's GBS based upon his explanation of how such causation might occur in the body. He first explained how ciguatera affected the nerves of the body, which explanation was consistent with what has been previously set forth in this opinion. He postulated that after prolonged activation of the sodium channels by the ciguatera toxin, the sodium channel is "probably" distorted, and its shape is affected. (Emphasis added). The sodium...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Marsh v. Valyou
...assumption — that trauma can cause fibromyalgia — which is not involved in pure opinion cases"); see also Kaelbel Wholesale, Inc. v. Soderstrom, 785 So.2d 539, 547 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) (rejecting the argument that causation testimony pure opinion, concluding that it "was not based upon perso......
-
Marsh v. Valyou
...Inc., 815 So.2d 652 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) (Frye-testing expert testimony linking drug ingestion to blindness); Kaelbel Wholesale, Inc. v. Soderstrom, 785 So.2d 539 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) (expert testimony linking ciguatera poisoning from fish to Guillian-Barre Syndrome excluded under Frye); Berry......
-
David v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.
...record and had not supplemented the record with any recent writings on the subject of DNA evidence. Cf. Kaelbel Wholesale, Inc. v. Soderstrom, 785 So.2d 539, 548 n. 3 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) (noting it was extremely helpful to the court's review that the relevant scientific publications were fi......
-
David v. National Railroad Passenger Corp., 00-815
...record and had not supplemented the record with any recent writings on the subject of DNA evidence. Cf. Kaelbel Wholesale, Inc. v. Soderstrom, 785 So. 2d 539, 548 n.3 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) (noting it was extremely helpful to the court's review that the relevant scientific publications were fi......
-
Witness
...expert was unfamiliar with testimony that patient would not have accepted hospitalization. Kaelbel Wholesale, Inc. v. Saderstrom, 785 So. 2d 539 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). In case alleging that Plaintiff’s disease of Guillain-Barre Syndrome (“GBS”) was caused by exposure to a marine toxin in fish......
-
Using medical literature on direct examination to win the "battle of the experts".
...(23) See generally Holy Cross Hospital, Inc. v. Marrone, 816 So. 2d 1113 (Fla. 4th D.C.A. 2002); Kaebel Wholesale, Inc., v. Soderstrom, 785 So. 2d 539 (Fla. 4th D.C.A. (24) See Gerber v. Iyenger, 735 So. 2d 1181 (Fla. 3d D.C.A. 1999) (trial court improperly permitted expert to testify about......
-
Challenging expert witness testimony in Florida products liability cases under Frye.
...is to look for and exploit inconsistencies between those expert witnesses. For example, in Kaelbel Wholesale, Inc. v. Soderstrom, 785 So. 2d 539 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001), the plaintiff claimed that the ciguatera food poisoning she contracted from the defendant's fish caused her to develop Guilla......