Kaiser Steel Corp v. Ranch Co, 1328
| Citation | 20 L.Ed.2d 835,88 S.Ct. 1753,391 U.S. 593 |
| Decision Date | 03 June 1968 |
| Docket Number | No. 1328,1328 |
| Parties | KAISER STEEL CORP. v. W. S. RANCH CO |
| Court | United States Supreme Court |
J. R. Modrall, for petitioner.
William R. Federici, for respondent.
Boston E. Witt, Atty. Gen., and F. Harlan Flint, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State of New Mexico ex rel. New Mexico State Engineer, amicus curiae.
Respondent brought this diversity suit in the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico, claiming an illegal trespass by petitioner and seeking damages and an injunction. Petitioner admitted the alleged trespass but claimed it was authorized to do this by N.M.Stat.Ann. § 75—1—3 (1953), in order to use water rights it had been granted by the State. Respondent contended that if § 75—1—3 were construed to authorize condemnation of private land to secure water for a private business, the law would violate the New Mexico Constitution, which permits the taking of private property only for 'public use.' N.M.Const., Art. II, § 20. The crucial issue thus became the interpretation of the term 'public use' in the State Constitution. The District Court held that the property had been taken for a public use, rejecting the suggestion in petitioner's brief that the action be stayed pending decision of the crucial question by the state courts. The Court of Appeals reversed on the merits, 388 F.2d 257 (10 Cir. 1967), and rejected petitioner's motion to stay the federal court's action until the state law issues could be settled in a declaratory judgment suit then pending in the state courts, 388 F.2d, at 262 (1968) ().
The Court of Appeals erred in refusing to stay its hand. The state law issue which is crucial in this case is one of vital concern in the arid State of New Mexico, where water is one of the most valuable natural resources. The issue, moreover, is a truly novel one. The question will eventually have to be resolved by the New Mexico courts, and since a declaratory judgment action is actually pending there, in all likelihood that resolution will be forthcoming soon. Sound judicial administration requires that the parties in this case be given the benefit of the same rule of law which will apply to all other businesses and landowners concerned with the use of this vital state resource.
The writ of certiorari is granted, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed, and the case is remanded with directions that the action be stayed in accordance with the prayer of petitioner. Federal jurisdiction will be retained in the District Court in order to insure a just disposition of this litigation should anything prevent a prompt state court determination.
It is...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Krzewinski v. Kugler, Civ. A. No. 1011-71.
...here is not a matter of "paramount interest" to the state as that term has been interpreted in Kaiser Steel Corp. v. W. S. Ranch Co., 391 U.S. 593, 594, 88 S.Ct. 1753, 20 L.Ed.2d 835 (1968). Under these circumstances, then, abstention would not be proper and we proceed to the B. The Constit......
-
Ankenbrandt v. Richards
...disposition of the matter upon the determination by the state court of the relevant issue. Cf. Kaiser Steel Corp. v. W.S. Ranch Co., 391 U.S. 593, 594, 88 S.Ct. 1753, 1754, 20 L.Ed.2d 835 (1968). Though he acknowledges that our earlier cases invoking the domestic relations exceptions speak ......
-
Weiser v. Koch
...Power & Light v. City of Thibodaux, 360 U.S. 25 79 S.Ct. 1070, 3 L.Ed.2d 1058 (1959).... See also Kaiser Steel Corp. v. W.S. Ranch, 391 U.S. 593 88 S.Ct. 1753, 20 L.Ed.2d 835 (1968); Hawks v. Hamill, 288 U.S. 52 53 S.Ct. 240, 77 L.Ed. 610 (1933). In some cases, however, the state question i......
-
Society for Good Will to Retarded Children v. Cuomo
...eminent domain power of municipalities under state law since the state law was unsettled. See also Kaiser Steel Corp. v. W.S. Ranch Co., 391 U.S. 593, 88 S.Ct. 1753, 20 L.Ed.2d 835 (1968); Hawks v. Hamill, 288 U.S. 52, 53 S.Ct. 240, 77 L.Ed. 610 (1933); but see County of Allegheny v. Frank ......
-
CAS Legal Mailbag – 4/13/23
...held true for another seventy-six years until the United States Supreme Court announced a new rule in Pickering v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 593 (1968). There, a teacher wrote a letter to the editor criticizing the superintendent’s budget, an act for which he was fired. The Illinois Supr......
-
CAS Legal Mailbag ' 4/13/23
...held true for another seventy-six years until the United States Supreme Court announced a new rule in Pickering v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 593 (1968). There, a teacher wrote a letter to the editor criticizing the superintendent's budget, an act for which he was fired. The Illinois Supr......
-
Issues Relating to Parallel Litigation
...(“Thibodaux abstention is a stay of federal proceedings until the meaning of a disputed state statute is resolved by state court.”) 69. 391 U.S. 593 (1968). 384 Business Torts and Unfair Competition Handbook administration require[d]” abstention, and the federal district court sitting in di......
-
CHAPTER 5
...application when a federal court is seemingly faced with a state-law issue of first impression. Cf. Kaiser Steel Corp. v. W. S. Ranch Co., 391 U.S. 593, 594 (1968) (observing that, in certain circumstances, federal courts should abstain from ruling on “novel” state-law issue of “vital conce......
-
Ascertaining the laws of the several states: positivism and judicial federalism after Erie.
...& White Taxicab, 276 U.S. at 535 (Holmes, J., dissenting)). (17) Id. at 78. (18) See, e.g., Kaiser Steel Corp. v. W.S. Ranch Co., 391 U.S. 593, 594 (1968) (per curiam) ("The Court of Appeals erred in refusing to stay its hand [as] [t]he state law issue which is crucial in this case ... ......
-
A precept of managerial responsibility: securing collective justice in institutional reform litigation.
...generally Burford v. Sun Oil Co., 319 U.S. 315 (1943). (48.) WRIGHT, supra note 28, [section] 4245; Kaiser Steel Corp. v. W.S. Ranch Co., 391 U.S. 593, 594 (1968). (49.) Carnegie-Mellon Univ. v. Cohill, 484 U.S. 343 (1988). (50.) Canaday v. Koch, 608 F. Supp. 1460 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd, 768 F.2......