Kalandras v. State
| Decision Date | 03 April 1969 |
| Docket Number | No. 325,325 |
| Citation | 6 Md.App. 480,251 A.2d 620 |
| Parties | Michael Joseph KALANDRAS v. STATE of Maryland. |
| Court | Court of Special Appeals of Maryland |
G. Denmead LeViness, Baltimore, on brief for appellant.
William E. Brannan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Baltimore, with whom were on brief: Francis B. Burch, Atty. Gen., Charles E. Moylan, Jr., State's Atty. for Baltimore City, Howard L. Cardin, Edward Garrison Neal, Asst. State's Attys. for Baltimore City, Baltimore, for appellee.
Before MURPHY, ANDERSON, MORTON, ORTH and THOMPSON, JJ.
The appellant, Michael Joseph Kalandras, was convicted of storehousebreaking with intent to steal goods of the value of $100 or more in the Criminal Court of Baltimore by Judge Charles D. Harris, sitting without a jury. He was sentenced to ten years under the jurisdiction of the Department of Correction.
The only issue raised on this appeal is whether appellant was illegally arrested.
From the evidence on the motion to suppress certain evidence at trial the following facts could be found:
Officer William Strickline was on duty on March 20, 1968 at 4:05 a. m. While driving his police car down Mace Street, in Baltimore, he had all of the windows rolled down because of the warm weather. He stopped at the rear parking lot of the Baltimore Car and Truck Rental Company and, while stopped, he heard sounds of 'coughing, sneezing and moving' coming from between some trucks parked on the lot. Officer Strickline left his car and entered the parking lot, which was an open lot and had no fences or gates; he observed two male persons sitting on the running board of a truck parked on the north side of the lot. As he approached the men, one slipped off the running board, went underneath the truck, and was not seen again. The other, the appellant, arose as Officer Strickline approached. Officer Strickline asked the appellant what he was doing there, to which the appellant replied that he had come from a bar and that he was ill. Officer Strickline observed that appellant's eyes were red and that he was crying and coughing, but he was unable to determine the reason for appellant's condition at that time. He also observed that appellant was wearing leather gloves. Officer Strickline took appellant to the police car and required him to sit in the car; he then called over the police radio for assistance. Within two or three minutes Officer Webster and his partner, Officer Shoremann, arrived in another car. Officer Webster searched the parking lot but found nothing. He then went to the Baltimore Car and Truck Rental Company building and found that the rear door was open. He entered the building, saw various tools lying in front of a safe, and noticed a strong odor of what seemed to be tear gas. He left the building and returned to Officers Strickline and Shoremann, informing them of what he had seen. The three officers and appellant then went to the rear door of the building. Officer Strickline observed the...
To continue reading
Request your trial
- Myers v. State
-
Denikos v. State
...by Wilson's prior action. See Hewitt v. State, 242 Md. 111, 218 A.2d 19; Mercer v. State, 237 Md. 479, 206 A.2d 797; Kalandras v. State, 6 Md.App. 480, 251 A.2d 620; Reagan v. State, 4 Md.App. 590, 244 A.2d 623. We think the record before us contains a sufficient evidentiary foundation to e......
-
Walters v. State
...the subsequent search was reasonable as incident to a lawful arrest then made. For support of the State's argument see Kalandras v. State, 6 Md.App. 480, 251 A.2d 620; Reagan v. State, 4 Md.App. 590, 244 A.2d 623. The court then 'Well, I am going to have to go one step further, which I real......
-
Taylor v. State
...made by the officer. See Hewitt v. State, 242 Md. 111, 218 A.2d 19; Mercer v. State, 237 Md. 479, 206 A.2d 797; Kalandras v. State, 6 Md.App. 480, 251 A.2d 620; Reagan v. State, 4 Md.App. 590, 244 A.2d 623. In either event, in making the arrest of appellant as he stood next to his vehicle o......