Kalb v. Feuerstein
| Decision Date | 29 June 1938 |
| Citation | 228 Wis. 525,280 N.W. 726 |
| Parties | KALB et al. v. FEUERSTEIN et al. |
| Court | Wisconsin Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Walworth County; Edgar V. Werner, Judge.
On motion for rehearing.
For former opinion, see 279 N.W. 687.
*726J. J. McManamy, of Madison, for appellants.
Moran & O'Brien, of Delavan, for respondents.
On motion for rehearing. The memorandum in Number 105, Ernest Newton Kalb, Appellant, v. Roscoe R. Luce et al., Respondents, Wis., 280 N.W. 725, decided herewith, covers both cases and for the reasons stated in Number 105, the motion for rehearing is denied.
Motion for rehearing is denied without costs.
To continue reading
Request your trial
4 cases
-
Leonard v. Bennett
...by the supreme court of the state: Kalb v. Luce, 228 Wis. 519, 279 N.W. 685, 280 N.W. 725; Kalb v. Feuerstein, 228 Wis. 525, 279 N.W. 687, 280 N.W. 726; Kalb v. Luce, 231 Wis. 186, 285 N.W. 431; Kalb v. Feuerstein, 231 Wis. 185, 285 N.W. The United States supreme court reversed the Wisconsi......
-
Kalb v. Feuerstein
...of passing upon questions raised by the demurrer other than those considered on the first appeal, 1938, 228 Wis. 525, 279 N.W. 687, 280 N.W. 726. Other facts will be stated in the opinion.J. J. McManamy, of Madison, for appellants.Moran & O'Brien, of Delavan, for respondents.ROSENBERRY, Chi......
- Kalb v. Luce
-
Kalb v. Feuerstein
...THE COURT: The issues raised upon this appeal were considered by this Court in Kalb v. Feuerstein, 1938, 228 Wis. 525, 279 N.W. 687, 280 N.W. 726. For the reasons there stated as ground for sustaining the demurrer to the complaint, the judgment of the court dismissing the complaint should b......