Kalich v. Knapp

Decision Date02 June 1914
Citation73 Or. 558,142 P. 594
PartiesKALICH v. KNAPP.
CourtOregon Supreme Court

Department 1.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Multnomah County; Henry E. McGinn, Judge.

Action by Peter Kalich against F. C. Knapp. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals. Reversed.

McBride C.J., dissenting.

Will R. King, of Washington, D. C. (King & Saxton, of Portland, on the brief) for appellant. R. W. Wilbur, of Portland (Wilbur, Spencer & Dibble, of Portland, on the brief), for respondent.

McNARY J.

As the result of colliding with an automobile driven by defendant plaintiff brings this action to recover $35,000 damages for a personal injury. The accident occurred shortly after midnight on November 19, 1911, at the intersection of Williams avenue and Russell street, in Portland. During the trial of the case, plaintiff offered in evidence certified copies of certain ordinances purposed to regulate the speed of motor vehicles within the limits of the municipality, but upon the objection of counsel for defendant, the court refused to allow the ordinances to be introduced into the case, upon the ground that the ordinances had been superseded by an act of the legislative assembly of the state of Oregon, known as the "Oregon Motor Vehicle Law," General Laws of 1911 pages 265-278. The result of the trial was a verdict in favor of defendant, whereupon plaintiff prosecutes this appeal.

The ordinances, being three in number, were adopted by the city during the years 1904 and 1906, and, considered as one specie of legislation, forbid any person to drive or operate an automobile at any point on the streets of the city at a greater speed than 15 miles per hour, or at a speed of more than 10 miles per hour within the fire limits, or at a speed greater than a walk upon any street where street cars turn. This local municipal legislation was enacted agreeably to the powers vested in the city by a charter granted by the state Legislature in 1903. Laws 1903, pp. 3 to 172. The portion of the charter appropriate to the subject under consideration follows:

"Sec. 72. The council shall have and exercise exclusively all legislative powers and authority of the city of Portland, and no legislative powers or authority, either expressed or implied, shall be exercised by any other person or persons, board or boards, other than the council. The council shall have full power and authority, except as herein otherwise provided, to exercise all powers conferred upon the city by this charter and the Constitution and laws of the state of Oregon."
"Sec. 73. The council has power and authority, subject to the provisions, limitations and restrictions in this charter contained--
"(1) To exercise within the limits of the city of Portland all the powers, commonly known as the police powers, to the same extent as the state of Oregon has or could exercise said power within said limits; * * *
"(60) Except as otherwise provided in this charter, or in the Constitution or Laws of the state of Oregon, to regulate and control, for any and every purpose, the use of the streets, highways, alleys, sidewalks, public thoroughfares, public places, and parks of the city; to regulate the use of streets, roads, highways, and public places for foot passengers, animals, bicycles, automobiles, and vehicles of all descriptions; * * *
"(63) To control and limit traffic on the streets, avenues, and elsewhere."

So far as is necessary to an understanding of the matter here involved, the Oregon Motor Vehicle Law, provides:

"An act providing for regulating the use, registration, license, identification, conduct and operation of vehicles operated upon the public roads, streets and highways of the state of Oregon; to regulate and license the persons who drive the same; to prescribe penalties for violations hereof and to prohibit the unauthorized possession or use of a vehicle and to provide penalty therefor; to license and identify all motor vehicles; to limit the authority of cities and towns on like subjects concerned with said vehicles, and to repeal all acts and parts of acts either in conformity or in conflict herewith.
Sec. 2, subdivision 17: "The rate of speed on all streets, roads and highways of this state shall be a reasonable speed, up to and not exceeding twenty-five miles an hour, but any speed in excess of twenty-five miles an hour upon any road or highway of this state shall be an unreasonable speed and is prohibited by this act; provided, however, that no motor vehicle shall be driven at a rate faster than eight miles an hour upon the country roads or highways of this state when within one hundred yards of any vehicle drawn by horse or horses."
Sec. 25: "Local authorities shall have no power to pass, enforce or maintain any ordinance, rule or regulation (1) requiring of any owner or operator of a vehicle any license fee or permit to use the public highways, or excluding or prohibiting any vehicle whose owner has complied with this act from the free use of streets, roads or highways of this state, except such driveway, speedway or road as has been or may be expressly set apart by law for the exclusive use of horses and light carriages, or except as herein provided; (2) affecting the registration or numbering of vehicles or prescribing a slower rate of speed than herein specified at which such vehicle may be operated, or the use of the streets, roads and highways of this state, contrary or inconsistent with the provisions of this act; and all such ordinances, rules or regulations now in force are hereby declared to be of no validity or effect; provided, however, that the local authorities may limit by ordinance, rule or regulation hereafter adopted, the speed of vehicles on the streets within their respective corporate limits, on condition that such ordinance, rule or regulation shall also fix the same speed limitation for all vehicles, not to be in any case less than one mile in six minutes and on further condition that local authorities shall also have placed conspicuously on each main street, road and highway of this state where the boundary of such local authority crosses the same and on every main street where the rate of speed changes, signs of sufficient size to be easily readable by persons using the same, bearing the words 'Slow down to ______ miles' (the rate being inserted) and with an arrow pointing in the direction where the speed is to be reduced or changed; and provided further, that said ordinance, rule or regulation shall fix the penalties for violation thereof similar to and no greater than those prescribed by this act for violation of speed limitation by any vehicles; and provided further, that nothing in this act contained shall be construed as limiting the power of local authorities to make, enforce and maintain further ordinances, rules or regulations affecting vehicles which are used to carry the public for hire."

Admitted by all, is the proposition, that but a single problem is here involved, namely, since the amendment of section 2 of article 11 of the state Constitution effective December 3, 1910, can the Legislature enact a statute, general in its application, calculated to repeal certain ordinances of the city of Portland theretofore enacted pursuant to the powers granted to the city in its charter? A consideration of this question impels a brief review of the organic and statutory laws applicable thereto. Section 2 of article 11 of the Constitution reads:

"Corporations may be formed under general laws, but shall not be created by the legislative assembly by special laws. The legislative assembly shall not enact, amend, or repeal any charter or act of incorporation for any
...

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Kalich v. Knapp
    • United States
    • Oregon Supreme Court
    • December 21, 1914
    ...Court of OregonDecember 21, 1914 In Banc. On petition for rehearing. Denied, and judgment of trial court reversed. For former opinion, see 142 P. 594. and Burnett, JJ., dissenting. Will R. King, of Washington, D. C., for appellant. R. W. Wilbur, of Portland (Wilbur, Spencer & Dibble, of Por......
  • Baker v. Uglow
    • United States
    • Oregon Supreme Court
    • December 15, 1914

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT